Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32701848›Full record

ArticlePain2020

The impact of bone cancer on the peripheral encoding of mechanical pressure stimuli.

Mateusz W Kucharczyk, Kim I Chisholm, Franziska Denk, Anthony H Dickenson, Kirsty Bannister, Stephen B McMahon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Calcium imaging for analgesic drug discovery.Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mateusz W KucharczykCentral Modulation of Pain Group, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kim I ChisholmNeurorestoration Group, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Franziska DenkNeurorestoration Group, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anthony H DickensonDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, Gower Street, London, United Kingdom.
Kirsty BannisterCentral Modulation of Pain Group, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Stephen B McMahonNeurorestoration Group, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/T002115/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 102645/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skeletal metastases are frequently accompanied by chronic pain that is mechanoceptive in nature. Mechanistically, cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP) is mediated by peripheral sensory neurons innervating the cancerous site, the cell bodies of which are housed in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG). How these somatosensory neurons encode sensory information in CIBP remains only partly explained. Using a validated rat model, we first confirmed cortical bone destruction in CIBP but not sham-operated rats (day 14 after surgery, designated "late"-stage bone cancer). This occurred with behavioural mechanical hypersensitivity (Kruskal-Wallis H for independent samples; CIBP vs sham-operated, day 14; P < 0.0001). Next, hypothesising that the proportion and phenotype of primary afferents would be altered in the disease state, dorsal root ganglia in vivo imaging of genetically encoded calcium indicators and Markov Cluster Analysis were used to analyse 1748 late-stage CIBP (n = 10) and 757 sham-operated (n = 9), neurons. Distinct clusters of responses to peripheral stimuli were revealed. In CIBP rats, upon knee compression of the leg ipsilateral to the tumour, (1) 3 times as many sensory afferents responded (repeated-measures analysis of variance: P < 0.0001 [vs sham]); (2) there were significantly more small neurons responding (Kruskal-Wallis for independent samples (vs sham): P < 0.0001); and (3) approximately 13% of traced tibial cavity afferents responded (no difference observed between CIBP and sham-operated animals). We conclude that an increased sensory afferent response is present in CIBP rats, and this is likely to reflect afferent recruitment from outside of the bone rather than increased intraosseous afferent activity.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsAnimalsFemaleGanglia, SpinalMaleRatsRats, Sprague-Dawley

Identifiers

PMID32701848
PMCPMC7365668
OpenAlexW3016570663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.