Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32701751›Full record

ArticlePediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2020

eStablish And Formalize Expert Criteria for Avoidable Resuscitation Review (SAFECARR) Electronic Delphi: Development of a Consensus Framework for Classifying and Reviewing Cardiac Arrests Within the PICU.

Maya Dewan, Amanda O'Halloran, Monica Kleinman, Ken Tegtmeyer, Regan Gallagher, Vinay Nadkarni, Robert M Sutton, Heather A Wolfe

Open access · greenAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maya DewanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
Amanda O'HalloranDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Monica KleinmanDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Ken TegtmeyerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
Regan GallagherDepartment of Patient Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Vinay NadkarniDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Robert M SuttonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Heather A WolfeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USBoston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

AHRQ Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Development Award (K08): Maya DewanK08HS026975 · AHRQ · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI DEWAN, MAYA L · 2020 to 2024
$752k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS026975NICHD NIH HHS L40 HD085270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a consensus framework that can guide the process of classifying and reviewing pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest in the PICU.

designA three-round electronic Delphi consensus study with an additional in-person session with pediatric resuscitation experts. The modified electronic Delphi consisted of survey questions sent to the expert panel with the goals of (1) achieving consensus on definitions of avoidable, potentially avoidable, and unavoidable PICU in-hospital cardiac arrest and (2) achieving consensus and ranking of a list of factors that contribute to potentially avoidable PICU in-hospital cardiac arrest.

settingElectronic surveys of resuscitation experts including pediatric critical care, cardiac critical care, emergency medicine, and hospital medicine physicians, nurses, advance practice nurses, and resuscitation researchers. PATIENTS: Not applicable.

interventionsNot applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsOver three rounds of an electronic Delphi, 24 resuscitation experts participated. In Round 1, consensus was reached for the definitions of potentially avoidable and unavoidable cardiac arrest. Consensus was not reached for avoidable cardiac arrest. In Round 2, the expert panel agreed with seven factors from the literature and achieved consensus on an additional seven factors. Consensus was achieved on the modified definition of avoidable cardiac arrest. In Round 3, participants were asked to rank the contributing factors in order of their importance. For the in-person session, the consensus definitions and contributing factors from the modified electronic Delphi were presented to a multidisciplinary group of pediatric resuscitation experts and reached consensus for all three definitions.

conclusionsA multidisciplinary group of pediatric resuscitation experts generated a consensus-based framework to classify and review pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest in the PICU. Future work will focus on the application of this framework and further validation of these definitions and contributing factors for in-hospital cardiac arrest both within and outside the PICU.

Indexed as

Heart ArrestChildDelphi TechniqueElectronicsHumansIntensive Care Units, Pediatric

Identifiers

PMID32701751
PMCPMC8809370
OpenAlexW3045030496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.