ReviewCurrent opinion in pulmonary medicine2020
Molecular profiling in sarcoidosis.
Review in Current opinion in pulmonary medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathogenetic Mechanisms Linking Sarcoidosis to Lymphoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- A review of sarcoidosis etiology, diagnosis and treatment.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Observational
- Biomarkers and molecular endotypes of sarcoidosis: lessons from omics and non-omics studies.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Standardization of flow cytometry and cell sorting to enable a transcriptomic analysis in a multi-site sarcoidosis study.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewSarcoidosis is a systemic disease characterized by granulomatous inflammation of unknown cause. There is extensive heterogeneity between patients with respect to the number and types of organs involved, disease course, and response to therapy. Recent research in the field has leveraged 'omics' techniques such as transcriptomics to identify important 'molecular profiles' in the disease. These tools may help in identifying clinically useful biomarkers and targets for therapy. RECENT
findingsSeveral studies have used gene expression profiling of predesignated lists or the entire genome to find genes and markers that differentiate sarcoidosis from healthy controls, but only a few have compared sarcoidosis patients based on disease phenotypes and organ involvement. The common gene pathways that have been repeatedly identified include those related to the interferon response, T-cell receptor signaling, and the major histocompatibility complex. SUMMARY: While the molecular profiling studies to date offer the ability to compare sarcoidosis and health as well as across tissues, further longitudinal studies that include sarcoidosis patients with varying outcomes with respect to organ involvement and response to treatment are needed to identify clinically important phenotypes in the disease that can then be differentiated based on molecular features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.