Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32701444›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2021

Stone clearance times with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Comparison of a 1.5 mm ballistic/ultrasonic mini-probe vs. laser.

Brennan Timm, Matthew Farag, Niall F Davis, David Webb, David Angus, Andrew Troy, Damien Bolton, Gregory S Jack

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Applications and Safety Considerations: 2024 Update.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  2. A 1.9 mm Trilogy lithotripter in mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy Description of technique and case outcomes.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Brennan TimmDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Matthew FaragDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Niall F DavisDepartment of Urology, Beaumont and Connolly Hospitals, Dublin, Ireland.
David WebbDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
David AngusDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Andrew TroyDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Damien BoltonDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Gregory S JackDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUConnolly Hospital Blanchardstown · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA limitation of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) is the narrow working channel of mini-nephroscopes, typically restricting instrumentation to 5 French (F) or smaller. We evaluated the efficacy of the 1.5 mm Swiss LithoClast

methodsA retrospective review of 30 consecutive mPCNL cases using the Trilogy and 30 W Holmium laser was performed. A 12 F MIPS nephroscope with a 16.5 F access sheath and 6.7 F working channel was used for all mPCNL cases. The Trilogy was used with a disposable 1.5 mm × 440 mm probe with dual ultrasonic and ballistic energy. The Ho:YAG laser was used with a 550 micron fibre and a maximum of 30 W. Stone clearance time (SCT) was defined by the total time interval between activation of the lithotripter until insertion of the nephrostomy tube and measured in mm

resultsEleven cases using a 1.5 mm Trilogy probe and 16 cases using a Ho:YAG laser met final inclusion criteria. Three cases using the Trilogy were excluded from final analysis due to conversion to alternative energy sources - two of those were upsized to standard PCNL and one was converted to laser. Mean stone diameter and density in the final Trilogy cohort was 26.7 mm and 1193 Hounsfield units (HU). Mean diameter and density in the laser cohort was 25.2 mm and 1049 HU. The mean stone area clearance time for Trilogy was 4.7±1.8 mm

conclusionsThe 1.5 mm mPCNL Trilogy probe was comparable to 30 W Ho:YAG laser for clearing hard stones. The Trilogy performed better than laser on soft stones with a HU density <1000 HU.

Identifiers

PMID32701444
PMCPMC7769519
OpenAlexW3042730884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.