Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32701288›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2020

Data Set Augmentation Allows Deep Learning-Based Virtual Screening to Better Generalize to Unseen Target Classes and Highlight Important Binding Interactions.

Jack Scantlebury, Nathan Brown, Frank Von Delft, Charlotte M Deane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. CombiningRSC advances · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Integrated Molecular Modeling and Machine Learning for Drug Design.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Deep Learning in Structure-Based Drug Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jack ScantleburyDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford, 24-29 St Giles, Oxford OX1 3LB, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-9877-0107
Nathan BrownBenevolentAI, 4-8 Maple Street, London W1T 5HD, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-9243-8699
Frank Von DelftStructural Genomics Consortium (SGC), University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-0378-0017
Charlotte M DeaneDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford, 24-29 St Giles, Oxford OX1 3LB, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-1388-2252

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S507611/1Wellcome Trust 106169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current deep learning methods for structure-based virtual screening take the structures of both the protein and the ligand as input but make little or no use of the protein structure when predicting ligand binding. Here, we show how a relatively simple method of data set augmentation forces such deep learning methods to take into account information from the protein. Models trained in this way are more generalizable (make better predictions on protein/ligand complexes from a different distribution to the training data). They also assign more meaningful importance to the protein and ligand atoms involved in binding. Overall, our results show that data set augmentation can help deep learning-based virtual screening to learn physical interactions rather than data set biases.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLigandsProteinsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID32701288
PMCPMC7611237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.