Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32700953›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2020

Direct and indirect effects of a couple-focused preventive intervention on children's outcomes: A randomized controlled trial with African American families.

Justin A Lavner, Allen W Barton, Steven R H Beach

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A culturally grounded prenatal coparenting intervention: Results of a randomized controlled trial with unmarried Black parents.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2022
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Protective parenting behavior buffers the impact of racial discrimination on depression among Black youth.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2021
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Parenting in the Context of the Child: Genetic and Social Processes.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Justin A LavnerDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-8121-0047
Allen W BartonDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies.ORCID 0000-0002-8888-2612
Steven R H BeachDepartment of Psychology and Center for Family Research.ORCID 0000-0001-8053-7761

Funding

Vulnerability to Drug Use & HIV: Advancing Prevention for Rural African AmericansP30DA027827 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI BRODY, GENE H. · 2009 to 2018
$10.2M
Using a Randomized Prevention Trial to Understand the Health Benefits of Supportive Couple Relationships among Rural African American AdultsR01AG059260 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI BEACH, STEVEN R · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
Home-based Prevention for African American Families in Rural CommunitiesR01HD069439 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI BEACH, STEVEN R · 2012 to 2016
$2.6M
National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNIA NIH HHS R01 AG059260NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069439NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA027827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study examined the effects of the Protecting Strong African American Families (ProSAAF) prevention program on children's outcomes more than 2 years after enrollment, including direct effects of the intervention and indirect effects through couple functioning and parent-child relations.

methodThree hundred forty-six African American couples with an early adolescent child participated; all families lived in rural, low-income communities in the southern United States. Families were randomly assigned to ProSAAF or control conditions and completed four waves of data collection. Couples reported couple functioning at baseline (Wave 1) and at 9-month follow-up (Wave 2), and parent-child relations at 17-month follow-up (Wave 3). Children reported their conduct problems, affiliation with deviant peers, substance use, sexual onset, depressive symptoms, and self-control at 25-month follow-up (Wave 4).

resultsPath analyses indicated significant indirect effects of ProSAAF on children's outcomes through improvements in couple functioning and better parent-child relations. There were no significant direct effects of the intervention on children's outcomes or significant indirect effects through couple functioning alone.

conclusionsThis couple-focused prevention program has positive indirect effects on several child outcomes through the intervening processes of promoting improvements in couple functioning and better parent-child relations. These findings provide cautious optimism regarding the possible benefits of couple-focused programming on participants' children while suggesting ways in which future couple-focused interventions could yield stronger effects on these youth. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanCouples TherapyFamily TherapyFollow-Up StudiesOutcome Assessment, Health CareParent-Child RelationsPovertyRural PopulationSpousesAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMalePeer Group

Identifiers

PMID32700953
PMCPMC8221283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.