ArticleInternational journal of cancer2021
Comprehensive genomic landscape and precision therapeutic approach in biliary tract cancers.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tucatinib and Trastuzumab for Previously Treated Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (SGNTUC-019): A Phase II Basket Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Trial
- Existing challenges in the management of cholangiocarcinoma in Spain.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Survival outcomes with matched targeted therapy in advanced biliary tract cancer: a large global cohort analysis.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Liquid biopsies in precision oncology for older adults with cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Integrating Genomics, Radiomics, and Pathomics in Oncology: A Scoping Review and a Framework for AI-Enabled Surgomics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Circulating Tumor DNA in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Precision Oncology Roadmap.Cancer management and research · 2026Review
- Prognostic Role of Circulating DNA in Biliary Tract Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2025Review
- Circulating tumor DNA in biliary tract cancers: A review of current applications.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Genomic landscape of biliary tract cancer and corresponding targeted treatment strategies.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Real-World Data: Implementation and Outcomes of Next-Generation Sequencing in the MENA Region.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advances in personalized medicine: translating genomic insights into targeted therapies for cancer treatment.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Biomarkers and Management of Cholangiocarcinoma: Unveiling New Horizons for Precision Therapy.Cancers · 2025Review
- Circulating tumor DNA in management of primary liver malignancy: A review of the literature and future directions.Journal of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Epidemiology and genomic features of biliary tract cancer and its unique features in Korea.Journal of liver cancer · 2025Article
- The Search for Risk, Diagnostic, and Prognostic Biomarkers of Cholangiocarcinoma and Their Biological and Clinicopathologic Significance.The American journal of pathology · 2025Review
- Liquid biopsy in biliary tract cancers: early diagnosis, precision therapy, and prognostic evaluation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Biliary tract cancers: advances in diagnostic and management.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Review
- Integration of circulating tumor DNA in biliary tract cancer: the emerging landscape.Hepatic oncology · 2024Review
- Peroral cholangioscopy-guided biopsy with novel biopsy forceps in comprehensive cancer genomic profiling for cystic duct carcinoma.Endoscopy · 2024Article
- Liquid biopsy: paving a new avenue for cancer research.Cell adhesion & migration · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Biliary tract cancers have dismal prognoses even when cytotoxic chemotherapy is administered. There is an unmet need to develop precision treatment approaches using comprehensive genomic profiling. A total of 121 patients with biliary tract cancers were analyzed for circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) and/or tissue-based tumor DNA (tissue-DNA) using clinical-grade next-generation sequencing: 71 patients (59%) had ctDNA; 90 (74%), tissue-DNA; and 40 (33%), both. Efficacy of targeted therapeutic approaches was assessed based upon ctDNA and tissue-DNA. At least one characterized alteration was detected in 76% of patients (54/71) for ctDNA [median, 2 (range, 0-9)] and 100% (90/90) for tissue-DNA [median, 4 (range, 1-9)]. Most common alterations occurred in TP53 (38%), KRAS (28%), and PIK3CA (14%) for ctDNA vs TP53 (44%), CDKN2A/B (33%) and KRAS (29%) for tissue-DNA. In 40 patients who had both ctDNA and tissue-DNA sequencing, overall concordance was higher between ctDNA and metastatic site tissue-DNA than between ctDNA and primary tumor DNA (78% vs 65% for TP53, 100% vs 74% for KRAS and 100% vs 87% for PIK3CA [But not statistical significance]). Among 80 patients who received systemic treatment, the molecularly matched therapeutic regimens based on genomic profiling showed a significantly longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio [95%confidence interval], 0.60 [0.37-0.99]. P = .047 [multivariate]) and higher disease control rate (61% vs 35%, P = .04) than unmatched regimens. Evaluation of ctDNA and tissue-DNA is feasible in biliary tract cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.