Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32700473›Full record

ReviewJournal of diabetes investigation2021

Microencapsulation of cells and molecular therapy of type 1 diabetes mellitus: The actual state and future perspectives between promise and progress.

Giuseppe Basta, Pia Montanucci, Riccardo Calafiore

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Type 1Micromachines · 2023
    Review
  10. Emerging of a new CD3Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giuseppe BastaDivision of Internal Medicine and Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences (MISEM), Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Pia MontanucciDivision of Internal Medicine and Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences (MISEM), Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7614-0742
Riccardo CalafioreDivision of Internal Medicine and Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences (MISEM), Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7560-0081
University of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The history of microencapsulation of live cells started with an idea of Thomas MS Chang in 1964, thereafter applied to isolated pancreatic islets by Anthony M Sun in 1980. The original aim was to provide isolated cells with an immune-protective shield, to prevent physical contact between the transplanted cells and the host's immune system, with retention of the microcapsules' biocompatibility and physical-chemical properties over time. In particular, this revolutionary approach essentially applied to islet grafts, in diabetic recipients who are not immunosuppressed, at a preclinical (rodents) and, subsequently, clinical level. Among the different chemistries potentially suitable for microencapsulation of live cells, alginic acid-based polymers, originally proposed by Sun, proved to be superior to all others in the following decades. In fact, only alginic acid-based microcapsules, containing allogeneic islets, ultimately entered pilot human clinical trials in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, as immuno-selectiveness and biocompatibility of alginic acid-hydrogels were never matched by other biopolymers. With problems related to human islet procurement coming into a sharper focus, in conjunction with technical limits of the encapsulated islet grafting procedures, new challenges are actually being pursued, with special regard to developing both new cellular systems - able to release immunomodulatory molecules and insulin itself - and new microencapsulation methods, with the use of novel polymeric formulations, under actual scrutiny. The use of embryonic and adult stem cells, within microcapsules, should address the restricted availability of cadaveric human donor-derived islets, whereas a new generation of newly-engineered microcapsules could better fulfill issues with graft site and long-term retention of biopolymer properties.

Indexed as

Cell EncapsulationAnimalsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Drug Delivery SystemsHumansModels, AnimalMolecular Targeted TherapyAlginateMicrocapsulesType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID32700473
PMCPMC7926256
OpenAlexW3045476006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.