Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32700389›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2020

Do physician incentives increase patient medication adherence?

Edward Kong, John Beshears, David Laibson, Brigitte Madrian, Kevin Volpp, George Loewenstein, Jonathan Kolstad, James J Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edward KongHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-9277-5302
John BeshearsNegotiation, Organizations & Markets Unit, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-3808-6423
David LaibsonHarvard Department of Economics, Cambridge, MA.
Brigitte MadrianNational Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-4820-4462
Kevin VolppDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
George LoewensteinDepartment of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University Dietrich College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-2790-0474
Jonathan KolstadNational Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
James J ChoiNational Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

Funding

Pilot CoreP30AG034532 · NIA · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI JOSEPH J DOYLE · 2009 to 2026
$10.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG034532NIA NIH HHS P30AG034532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test the effectiveness of physician incentives for increasing patient medication adherence in three drug classes: diabetes medication, antihypertensives, and statins. DATA SOURCES: Pharmacy and medical claims from a large Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan from January 2011 to December 2012. STUDY

designWe conducted a randomized experiment (911 primary care practices and 8,935 nonadherent patients) to test the effect of paying physicians for increasing patient medication adherence in three drug classes: diabetes medication, antihypertensives, and statins. We measured patients' medication adherence for 18 (6) months before (after) the intervention. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsWe obtained data directly from the health insurer. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe found no evidence that physician incentives increased adherence in any drug class. Our results rule out increases in the proportion of days covered by medication larger than 4.2 percentage points.

conclusionsPhysician incentives of $50 per patient per drug class are not effective for increasing patient medication adherence among the drug classes and primary care practices studied. Such incentives may be more likely to improve measures under physicians' direct control rather than those that predominantly reflect patient behaviors. Additional research is warranted to disentangle whether physician effort is not responsive to these types of incentives, or medication adherence is not responsive to physician effort. Our results suggest that significant changes in the incentive amount or program design may be necessary to produce responses from physicians or patients.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringMotivationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPhysician Incentive PlansPhysiciansPrimary Health Carehealth economicsmedication adherencephysician payment incentivesprimary carequality improvement

Identifiers

PMID32700389
PMCPMC7376007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.