Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32700270›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Assessment of spatio-temporal variations in lake water body using indexing method.

Prachi Vasistha, Rajiv Ganguly

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Prachi VasisthaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Jaypee University of Information Technology, District Solan, Waknaghat, Himachal Pradesh, 173234, India.
Rajiv GangulyDepartment of Civil Engineering, Jaypee University of Information Technology, District Solan, Waknaghat, Himachal Pradesh, 173234, India. rajiv.ganguly@juit.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5356-1635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study assesses the characteristics of two lakes located in close vicinity to each other in identifying the status of the lakes based on Designated Best Use (DBU) criteria for optimum utilization and use. Further, the study reports the characteristic assessment of the lakes for two seasons with sampling carried out in August and October months of 2019 and samples collected at different depths and locations to present the comprehensive existing water quality conditions of the lake. The study utilized about twenty parameters evaluated experimentally for determination of Water Quality Indices. In this context, different water quality indices including National Sanitation Foundation Method (NSFWQI) and BIS 10500 (BISWQI) were utilized in determining the indices. The WQI were determined depth wise and a weighted average method was utilized in presenting the overall WQI of the lakes which represents the true water quality based on depth wise evaluation. Hence, the study represents both spatial and temporal variations in the lake water quality. The overall classification of water quality for both the lakes using the NSFWQI methodology was good for both the sampling periods. Similarly, the overall water quality was categorized to be excellent for both the sampling periods using the BISWQI. Further, a new approach in determining water quality indexing is presented through introduction of a Modified Water Quality Index (MWQI) which utilizes the maximum number of parameters and thereby provides a means to reduce ambiguity and eclipsing problems of WQI. Using this newly developed MWQI, the water quality was categorized to be excellent and good for samples collected in August and October respectively for both the lakes. However, conservative estimation considering spillover effects may lead to classification of good category using MWQI. The Heavy Metal Pollution Index (HMI) were classified to be good for both the lakes and sampling periods. Spectral characterization of water samples revealed the presence of oxygen (O), tantalum (Ta), sodium (Na) and Zinc (Zn). However, further monitoring studies are being carried out to cover a period of 1 year to observe if there is a change in water quality due or any seasonal variations.

Indexed as

Metals, HeavyWater Pollutants, ChemicalEnvironmental MonitoringLakesSeasonsWater QualityMetals, HeavyWater Pollutants, ChemicalDesignated Best Use (DBU)Modified Water Quality Index (MWQI)Water Quality Assessment (WQA)Water Quality Index (WQI)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.