Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32700236›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

Application of transoral endoscopic parathyroidectomy via vestibular approach, endoscopic parathyroidectomy via areola approach for parathyroid adenoma.

Qingquan Zhao, Wenrui Wang, Xing Yu, Yong Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qingquan ZhaoDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Donghai Road, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China.
Wenrui WangDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, Dezhou People's Hospital, Dong Fang Hong West Road, Dezhou, 253000, Shandong, China.
Xing YuDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang, China.
Yong WangDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang, China. surgwy@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5450-1340
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNDezhou University · CNFujian Medical University · CN

Funding

Zhejiang Provincial Basic Public Welfare Project LGF18H160002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransoral endoscopic parathyroidectomy via vestibular approach (TOEPVA) and total endoscopic parathyroidectomy via areola approach (EPA) are commonly used endoscopic parathyroidectomy approaches. This study compares effectiveness of these approaches with conventional open parathyroidectomy (COP) in relation to safety, associated trauma, and feasibility in the treatment of parathyroid adenoma (PTA).

methodsWe examined patients who had undergone TOEPVA (n = 15), EPA (n = 14), and COP (n = 30). All patients had a pathological diagnosis of PTA. We analyzed operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, postoperative drainage volume, hospital stay and complications such as changes in parathyroid hormone (PTH) and serum calcium before and after surgery.

resultsClinical variables across the three experimental groups were similar except for patient age. TOEPVA and EPA groups had a higher proportion of young patients than COP group. Operation time for endoscopic group was longer than that of open group, and the longest operation time was recorded in TOEPVA group (P = 0.000). Postoperative VAS score: postoperative pain in patients in the endoscopic group was less than that of patients in the open group on the first day (P = 0.001). Postoperative pain in patients of the endoscopic group was significant on the second day (P = 0.044). Pain experienced by patients in the three groups was the same on the third day after surgery (P = 0.312). Postoperative drainage volume in the endoscopic group was more than that in the open group (P = 0.000). There were no significant differences between intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.089), complications (P = 0.407) and hospital stay (P = 0.389) in TOEPVA, EPA and COP groups. PTH and serum calcium levels in the three experimental groups were considerably lower after surgery (P < 0.05). Tumor recurrence was not recorded in the three groups during a follow-up period of between 3 and 36 months.

conclusionsTOEPVA and EPA are safe treatment options for PTA. The therapeutic effects of TOEPVA and EPA were similar to those of COP in the treatment of PTA.

Indexed as

ParathyroidectomyParathyroid NeoplasmsEndoscopyHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNipplesParathyroid HormoneParathyroid HormoneAreola approachEndoscopic parathyroidectomyParathyroid adenomaSafetyTraumaVestibular approach

Identifiers

PMID32700236
OpenAlexW3044487078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.