Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32700137›Full record

ReviewOncology and therapy2018

A Review of Omacetaxine: A Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatment Resurrected.

Eric S Winer, Daniel J DeAngelo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncology and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. SVC112: From Hummingbirds to Head and Neck Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Real-world Management of CML: Outcomes and Treatment Patterns.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric S WinerAdult Leukemia Program, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. EricS_Winer@DFCI.HARVARD.EDU.
Daniel J DeAngeloAdult Leukemia Program, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paradigm of targeted therapy was pioneered for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has led to marked improvements in responses and overall survival; however, there is still a subset of patients that are either resistant through a multitude of mechanisms or intolerant to standard TKI therapy. Omacetaxine mepesuccinate (omacetaxine), a semisynthetic purified homoharringtonine compound, has been studied for over 40 years and was approved in 2012 by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients with CML refractory or intolerant to two or more TKIs. Omacetaxine has a novel mechanism of action-inhibition of protein synthesis, which does not overlap with kinase inhibition. Multiple studies have demonstrated that omacetaxine can achieve responses in heavily treated patients with either chronic-phase or accelerated-phase CML, regardless of the presence of mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain. This review will outline the tortuous story of omacetaxine, including preclinical and clinical studies of homoharringtonine, current indications, and management guidelines.

Indexed as

Chronic myeloid leukemiaOmacetaxineTyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32700137
PMCPMC7359993
OpenAlexW2790896376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.