Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32700098›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2020

Suspension training vs. traditional resistance training: effects on muscle mass, strength and functional performance in older adults.

Samuel Domingos Soligon, Deivid Gomes da Silva, João Guilherme Almeida Bergamasco, Vitor Angleri, Ricardo Alessandro Medalha Júnior, Nathalia Fernanda Dias, Sanmy Rocha Nóbrega, Marcelo de Castro Cesar, Cleiton Augusto Libardi

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Resistance Training before, during, and after COVID-19 Infection: What Have We Learned So Far?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  13. Strength training in elderly: An useful tool against sarcopenia.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Aging With Strength: Functional Training to Support Independence and Quality of Life.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Samuel Domingos SoligonMUSCULAB, Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, UFSCar, Rod. Washington Luiz, km 235-SP 310, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
Deivid Gomes da SilvaMUSCULAB, Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, UFSCar, Rod. Washington Luiz, km 235-SP 310, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
João Guilherme Almeida BergamascoMUSCULAB, Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, UFSCar, Rod. Washington Luiz, km 235-SP 310, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
Vitor AngleriMUSCULAB, Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, UFSCar, Rod. Washington Luiz, km 235-SP 310, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
Ricardo Alessandro Medalha JúniorMUSCULAB, Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, UFSCar, Rod. Washington Luiz, km 235-SP 310, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
Nathalia Fernanda DiasMUSCULAB, Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, UFSCar, Rod. Washington Luiz, km 235-SP 310, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
Sanmy Rocha NóbregaMUSCULAB, Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, UFSCar, Rod. Washington Luiz, km 235-SP 310, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
Marcelo de Castro CesarDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of São Carlos, UFSCar, Rod. Washington Luiz, km 235-SP 310, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
Cleiton Augusto LibardiMUSCULAB, Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos, UFSCar, Rod. Washington Luiz, km 235-SP 310, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil. c.libardi@ufscar.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9003-7610

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 302801/ 2018-9Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/05331- 6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe compared the effects of suspension training (ST) with traditional resistance training (TRT) on muscle mass, strength and functional performance in older adults.

methodsForty-two untrained older adults were randomized in TRT, ST (both performed 3 sets of whole body exercises to muscle failure) or control group (CON). Muscle thickness (MT) of biceps brachii (MT

resultsMT

conclusionSuspension training (ST) promotes similar muscle mass, strength and functional performance improvements compared to TRT in older adults.

Indexed as

Muscle StrengthAgedFemaleGaitHumansLegMaleMiddle AgedMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalResistance TrainingAgingFunctionalityInstability resistance trainingMuscle hypertrophyTRX training

Identifiers

PMID32700098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.