Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32700090›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2021

Patterns of progression in patients treated for immuno-oncology antibodies combination.

Alice Bernard-Tessier, Capucine Baldini, Eduardo Castanon, Patricia Martin, Stéphane Champiat, Antoine Hollebecque, Sophie Postel-Vinay, Andreea Varga, Rastilav Bahleda, Anas Gazzah and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patterns of pseudoprogression across different cancer entities treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Joint EANM/SNMMI/ANZSNM practice guidelines/procedure standards on recommended use of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alice Bernard-TessierDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, 94805, France.
Capucine BaldiniDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, 94805, France.
Eduardo CastanonDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, 94805, France.
Patricia MartinDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, 94805, France.
Stéphane ChampiatDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, 94805, France.
Antoine HollebecqueDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, 94805, France.
Sophie Postel-VinayDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, 94805, France.
Andreea VargaDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, 94805, France.
Rastilav BahledaDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, 94805, France.
Anas GazzahDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, 94805, France.
Jean-Marie MichotDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, 94805, France.
Vincent RibragDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, 94805, France.
Jean-Pierre ArmandDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, 94805, France.
Aurélien MarabelleDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, 94805, France.
Jean-Charles SoriaDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, 94805, France.
Christophe MassardDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, 94805, France. Christophe.massard@gustaveroussy.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5505-0564
Samy AmmariDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, 94805, France.
Université Paris-Saclay · FRInserm · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew patterns of progression under immune-oncology (IO) antibodies (mAb) have been described such as pseudoprogression. Except for melanoma, variations between studies reveal difficulties to establish their prevalence.

methodsThis retrospective study enrolled patients participating in IO phase I trials at Gustave Roussy cancer center for solid tumors excluding melanoma. Radiological assessment according to iRECIST was correlated with prospectively registered patient characteristics and outcomes. Pseudoprogression (PsPD) was defined as RECIST-defined progression followed by stabilization or decrease at the next imaging, and dissociated response (DisR) as concomitant decrease in some tumor lesions and increase in others at a same timepoint.

resultsAmong 360 patients included, 74% received IO mAb combination: 45% with another IO mAb, 20% with targeted therapy and 10% with radiotherapy. The overall response rate was 19.7%. PsPD were observed in 10 (2.8%) patients and DisR in 12 (3.3%) patients. Atypical responses (AR), including PsPD and DisR, were not associated with any patient's baseline characteristics. Compare with typical responder patients, patients experiencing AR presented a shorter iPFS (HR 0.34; p < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.27; p = 0.026). Among the 203 patients who progressed in 12 weeks, 80 (39.4%) patients were treated beyond progression. PD was confirmed in 80% of cases, while 10% of patients presented a response.

conclusionPseudoprogression and dissociated response are uncommon patterns of progression. Their prevalence should be balanced with the rate of real progressing patients treated beyond progression. Prognosis or on-treatment biomarkers are needed to identify early patients who will benefit from immunotherapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodiesAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansImmunotherapyMaleMedical OncologyMelanomaMiddle AgedPrognosisResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsRetrospective StudiesAntibodiesAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalImaging evaluationImmune checkpoint inhibitorsImmunotherapyPhase IPseudoprogression

Identifiers

PMID32700090
PMCPMC10973750
OpenAlexW3045153942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.