Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32700089›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2021

Prediction of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer recurrence during intravesical BCG immunotherapy by use of peripheral blood eosinophil count and percentage: a preliminary report.

Mustafa Zafer Temiz, Aykut Colakerol, Ismail Ulus, Enes Kilic, Filip Paslanmaz, Sergen Sahin, Emrah Yuruk, Engin Kandirali, Atilla Semercioz, Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Eosinophils in solid cancers: sentinels, predictors, and therapeutic allies.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mustafa Zafer TemizDepartment of Urology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Merkez Mh, Dr. Sadık Ahmet Caddesi, Bagcilar, 34100, Istanbul, Turkey. dr_mustafazafertemiz@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5736-5495
Aykut ColakerolDepartment of Urology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Merkez Mh, Dr. Sadık Ahmet Caddesi, Bagcilar, 34100, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5076-5306
Ismail UlusDepartment of Urology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Merkez Mh, Dr. Sadık Ahmet Caddesi, Bagcilar, 34100, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2005-9734
Enes KilicDepartment of Urology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Merkez Mh, Dr. Sadık Ahmet Caddesi, Bagcilar, 34100, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3235-3025
Filip PaslanmazDepartment of Urology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Merkez Mh, Dr. Sadık Ahmet Caddesi, Bagcilar, 34100, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4556-5518
Sergen SahinDepartment of Urology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Merkez Mh, Dr. Sadık Ahmet Caddesi, Bagcilar, 34100, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2951-5991
Emrah YurukDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences/Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Merkez Mh, Dr. Sadık Ahmet Caddesi, Bagcilar, 34100, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2343-8828
Engin KandiraliDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences/Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Merkez Mh, Dr. Sadık Ahmet Caddesi, Bagcilar, 34100, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0580-2144
Atilla SemerciozDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences/Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Merkez Mh, Dr. Sadık Ahmet Caddesi, Bagcilar, 34100, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8688-4772
Ahmet Yaser MuslumanogluDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences/Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Merkez Mh, Dr. Sadık Ahmet Caddesi, Bagcilar, 34100, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8691-0886
Bağcılar Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether there is an association between blood eosinophil count and percentage with the recurrence of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) during Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) maintenance therapy with our preliminary results.

methodsA total of 53 patients with NMIBC underwent BCG immunotherapy between January 2015 and September 2018, and met our inclusion criteria were included in the study. The parameters age, gender, smoking status, comorbidity, blood neutrophil, lymphocyte and eosinophil counts, blood eosinophil percentage, previous single postoperative intravesical chemotherapy instillation, tumor characteristic, and total and maintenance dose numbers of BCG were extracted from our medical records and compared between patients with response and with recurrence.

resultsBlood eosinophil count and percentage were significantly higher in patients with recurrence compared to patients with response (0.263 ± 0.37 vs. 0.0134 ± 0.021, p = 0.01 and 0.31 ± 0.29 vs. 0.17 ± 0.27, p = 0.01). Other parameters were similar in patients with recurrence and response. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed a considerable diagnostic value of blood eosinophil count and percentage in the prediction of bladder cancer recurrence during BCG immunotherapy.

conclusionBlood eosinophil count and percentage in patients with NMIBC can predict the disease recurrence during the BCG immunotherapy. Our research raised new questions and assumptions about the role of eosinophils during BCG immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, IntravesicalBCG VaccineComorbidityDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleEosinophilsFemaleHumansImmunotherapyLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeutrophilsRetrospective StudiesAdjuvants, ImmunologicBCG VaccineBCGEosinophilsLocal neoplasm recurrenceUrinary bladder neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32700089
PMCPMC10991931
OpenAlexW3043983550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.