Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32700069›Full record

ReviewOncology and therapy2020

Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer as a Distinct Disease: Implications for Therapeutic Strategy.

Jocelyn Luveta, Ruth M Parks, David M Heery, Kwok-Leung Cheung, Simon J Johnston

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncology and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jocelyn LuvetaDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ruth M ParksDivision of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
David M HeeryGene Regulation and RNA Biology, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Kwok-Leung CheungDivision of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Simon J JohnstonDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. simon.johnston@nottingham.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive lobular carcinoma comprises 10-15% of all breast cancers and is increasingly recognised as a distinct and understudied disease compared with the predominant histological subtype, invasive ductal carcinoma. Hallmarks of invasive lobular carcinoma include E-cadherin loss, leading to discohesive morphology with cells proliferating in single-file strands and oestrogen receptor positivity, with favourable response to endocrine therapy. This review summarises the distinct histological and molecular features of invasive lobular carcinoma with focus on diagnostic challenges and the impact on surgical management and medical therapy. Emphasis is placed on recent advances in our understanding of the unique molecular biology of lobular breast cancer and how this is optimising our therapy approach in the clinic.

Indexed as

Aromatase inhibitorsBreast cancerEndocrine therapyHistologyImmunotherapyInvasive lobular carcinomaMolecular biologySurgical managementTamoxifenTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID32700069
PMCPMC7359988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.