ReviewDer Pathologe2021
[Reporting and handling of lymphonodectomy specimens in gynecologic malignancies and sentinel lymph nodes].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnosis and Prognosis of Canine Melanocytic Neoplasms.Veterinary sciences · 2022Review
- The potential risk of contralateral non-sentinel groin node metastasis in women with early primary vulvar cancer following unilateral sentinel node metastasis: a single center evaluation in University Hospital of Düsseldorf.BMC women's health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The handling and reporting of resected lymph nodes in gynecologic cancer follows the recommendations of the German national guidelines and the recommendations of the International Collaboration of Cancer Reporting (ICCR) and the International Society of Gynecologic Pathologists (ISGyP). The definitions of micrometastases and isolated tumor cells are in accordance with the definition of the UICC (Union Internationale Contre le Cancer) and TNM system. Both findings must be reported as part of the pathology report and final tumor classification. It is mandatory to examine all excised lymph nodes with complete processing of all nodes up to 0.3 cm and slicing of all larger nodes in 0.2-cm wide intervals with complete processing of all lamellae. The amount of the resected lymph nodes in correlation to positive nodes, the metric dimension of the largest lymph node metastasis per lymph node region, and the presence of extracapsular extension of the lymph node deposits must be part of the pathology report. The handling and cutting of sentinel lymph nodes are similar to nonsentinel nodes. Within frozen section analyses and final processing from paraffin-embedded sentinel nodes, all nodes should be examined by three-step sections with an interval of about 200 µm. In cases of negative sentinel nodes on H&E staining, immunohistochemical ultrastaging should be performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.