Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32700061›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2021

[Reporting and handling of lymphonodectomy specimens in gynecologic malignancies and sentinel lymph nodes].

Anne Kathrin Höhn, Christine E Brambs, Ramona Erber, Grit Gesine Ruth Hiller, Doris Mayr, Dietmar Schmidt, Elisa Schmoeckel, Lars-Christian Horn

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anne Kathrin HöhnInstitut für Pathologie, Arbeitsgruppe Mamma‑, Gynäko- & Perinatalpathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstraße 26, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland. annekathrin.hoehn@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Christine E BrambsFrauenklinik des Klinikums rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland.
Ramona ErberPathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Grit Gesine Ruth HillerInstitut für Pathologie, Arbeitsgruppe Mamma‑, Gynäko- & Perinatalpathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstraße 26, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Doris MayrPathologisches Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.
Dietmar SchmidtMVZ für Histologie, Zytologie und Molekulare Diagnostik Trier, Trier, Deutschland.
Elisa SchmoeckelPathologisches Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.
Lars-Christian HornInstitut für Pathologie, Arbeitsgruppe Mamma‑, Gynäko- & Perinatalpathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstraße 26, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
University Hospital Leipzig · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DEZentrum für Pathologie und Zytodiagnostik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The handling and reporting of resected lymph nodes in gynecologic cancer follows the recommendations of the German national guidelines and the recommendations of the International Collaboration of Cancer Reporting (ICCR) and the International Society of Gynecologic Pathologists (ISGyP). The definitions of micrometastases and isolated tumor cells are in accordance with the definition of the UICC (Union Internationale Contre le Cancer) and TNM system. Both findings must be reported as part of the pathology report and final tumor classification. It is mandatory to examine all excised lymph nodes with complete processing of all nodes up to 0.3 cm and slicing of all larger nodes in 0.2-cm wide intervals with complete processing of all lamellae. The amount of the resected lymph nodes in correlation to positive nodes, the metric dimension of the largest lymph node metastasis per lymph node region, and the presence of extracapsular extension of the lymph node deposits must be part of the pathology report. The handling and cutting of sentinel lymph nodes are similar to nonsentinel nodes. Within frozen section analyses and final processing from paraffin-embedded sentinel nodes, all nodes should be examined by three-step sections with an interval of about 200 µm. In cases of negative sentinel nodes on H&E staining, immunohistochemical ultrastaging should be performed.

Indexed as

Genital Neoplasms, FemaleSentinel Lymph NodeFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesNeoplasm StagingSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyCuttingIsolated tumor cellsLymph nodeMicrometastasesReportingUltrastaging

Identifiers

PMID32700061
PMCPMC8084808
OpenAlexW3045152640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.