Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32699998›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

The dyadic relationship of benefit finding and its impact on quality of life in colorectal cancer survivor and spousal caregiver couples.

Yi Lin, Xingjuan Luo, Jieyu Li, Yinghua Xu, Qiuping Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Factors associated with benefit finding and mental health of patients with cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Interdependence relationships between unmet supportive care needs and its influencing factors in couples coping with colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Caring through uncertainty: a qualitative exploration of older colorectal cancer caregivers' experiences during palliative chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The impact of social support on benefit finding among patients with advanced lung cancer and their caregivers: based on actor-partner interdependence mediation model.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  20. Supportive care needs and associated factors among caregivers of patients with colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yi LinWuxi Medical School, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China.
Xingjuan LuoWuxi Medical School, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China.
Jieyu LiWuxi Medical School, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yinghua XuWuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China. 540923082@qq.com.
Qiuping LiWuxi Medical School, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China. liqp@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-026X
Jiangnan University · CNWuxi People's Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81773297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore the benefit finding (BF) relationship between colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors and their spousal caregivers, and to discover the dyadic impact of BF on quality of life (QOL) in CRC survivor and spousal caregiver couples.

methodsConducted from May 2018 to December 2018, the study included 286 couples consisting of CRC survivors and their spousal caregivers. The study survey evaluated participants' BF, anxiety, depression, and QOL. Data analysis methods included Pearson's correlation, paired t test, and the actor-partner interdependence mediation model (APIMeM).

resultsCRC survivors and spousal caregivers reported comparable moderate to high BF experience (ranging from 68.9 to 80.8%). Moderate to high correlations were found between CRC survivors and their spousal caregivers in all of the paired BFs (including the overall BF scale and three factors) (all Ps < 0.001, r = 0.461-0.612). We found significant positive correlations of the same measures between dyads of CRC survivors and spousal caregivers (r = 0.331-0.612), including BFS-C (overall BF scale and three subscales), HADS-C (anxiety and depression), PCS, and MCS. To a certain degree, BF exerts an impact on couples' QOL through the mediating effect of psychological distress (anxiety and depression).

conclusionsThe present study further confirms the dyadic interdependence between BF, anxiety, depression, and QOL in couples coping with CRC. In addition, the APIMeM findings may support the proposed mechanism, in that buffering against negative emotions (psychological distress) is an approach in which BF plays an important role, e.g., improves QOL, in the context of a stressful process.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsCaregiversColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeSpousesSurveys and QuestionnairesBenefit findingChineseColorectal cancerQuality of lifeSpousal caregiversThe Actor-Partner Interdependence Mediation Model

Identifiers

PMID32699998
OpenAlexW3045438248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.