Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32699951›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2021

3D imaging for hindfoot alignment assessment: a comparative study between non-weight-bearing MRI and weight-bearing CT.

Anil Haldar, Alessio Bernasconi, Syed Ehtesham Junaid, Kar Ho Brian Lee, Matthew Welck, Asif Saifuddin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A novel use of cone beam CT: flexion and extension weight-bearing imaging to assess spinal stability.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anil HaldarFoot and Ankle Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, UK. drahaldar@doctors.org.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6068-0082
Alessio BernasconiFoot and Ankle Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, UK.
Syed Ehtesham JunaidDepartment of Imaging, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, UK.
Kar Ho Brian LeeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Kwong Wah Hospital, 25 Waterloo Road, Yau Ma Tei, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Matthew WelckFoot and Ankle Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, UK.
Asif SaifuddinDepartment of Imaging, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe authors compared measurements of hindfoot alignment on MR imaging with weight-bearing CT (WB-CT) to establish the degree of correlation. Forty-seven feet in 44 patients had weight-bearing CT and MRI studies performed on the same day. MATERIALS AND

methodsHindfoot alignment on MRI was assessed by two radiologists who calculated tibiocalcaneal angle (TCA) and calcaneofibular ligament angle (CFLA). On WB-CT, foot ankle offset (FAO), calcaneal offset (CO) and hindfoot angle (HA) were assessed by a senior Foot and Ankle Surgeon using dedicated software. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between these measurements.

resultsThe study group comprised 27 males and 17 females with a mean age of 45 years (range 13-79 years). A statistically significant positive correlation was identified between TCA on MRI and all measurements of hindfoot alignment on WB-CT (p = 0.001-0.005). The CFLA on MRI only had significant correlation with CO on WB-CT (p = 0.03). A significant negative correlation was observed between both MRI parameters (p < 0.001).

conclusionA highly significant correlation between tibiocalcaneal angle on non-weight-bearing ankle MR imaging and hindfoot alignment measurements on weight-bearing CT was identified.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedWeight-BearingYoung AdultFoot ankle offsetHindfootMalalignmentMRITibiocalcaneal angleWeight-bearing CT

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.