Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32699840›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in physiology2019

Cardiac hypertrophy or failure? - A systematic evaluation of the transverse aortic constriction model in C57BL/6NTac and C57BL/6J substrains.

Min Zi, Nicholas Stafford, Sukhpal Prehar, Florence Baudoin, Delvac Oceandy, Xin Wang, Thuy Bui, Mohamed Shaheen, Ludwig Neyses, Elizabeth J Cartwright

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Editorial: Understanding the physiology of ageing.Current research in physiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Min ZiDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Nicholas StaffordDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Sukhpal PreharDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Florence BaudoinDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Delvac OceandyDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Xin WangDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Thuy BuiDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Mohamed ShaheenDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Ludwig NeysesDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth J CartwrightDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1002082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe mouse model of transverse aortic constriction (TAC) has been widely used as a cardiac stress in the investigation of the molecular mechanisms of cardiac hypertrophy. Recently, the International Knockout Mouse Consortium has selected the C57BL/6NTac (BL/6N) mouse strain to generate null alleles for all mouse genes; however, a range of genetic and cardiac phenotypic differences have been reported between this substrain and the commonly used C57BL/6J (BL/6J) substrain. It has been reported by Garcia-Menendez and colleagues that 12-week C57BL/6NTac mice are susceptible to heart failure but little is known about the cardiac remodeling in this substrain as cardiac function progresses from compensation to decompensation.

methodsBL/6J and BL/6N mice were subjected to pressure overload via TAC. The impact of both age and duration of cardiac pressure overload induced by TAC on cardiac remodelling were systematically assessed.

resultsOur data showed that BL/6N mice developed eccentric hypertrophy with age- and time-dependent deterioration in cardiac function, accompanied by considerable interstitial fibrosis. In contrast, BL/6J mice were more resilient to TAC-induced cardiac stress and developed variable cardiac phenotypes independent of age and the duration of pressure overload. This was likely due to the greater variability in pre-TAC aortic arch dimension as measured by echocardiography. In addition to increased expression of brain natriuretic peptide and collagen gene type 1 and 3, BL/6N mice also had greater angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT2R) gene expression than BL/6J counterparts at baseline and after 2-weeks TAC, which may contribute to the exacerbated interstitial fibrosis.

conclusionsBL/6N and BL/6J mice have very different responses to TAC stimulation and these differences should be taken into consideration when using the substrains to investigate the mechanisms of hypertrophy and heart failure.

Indexed as

C57BL/6Cardiac hypertrophyHeart failureTransverse aortic constriction (TAC)

Identifiers

PMID32699840
PMCPMC7357793
OpenAlexW2988999183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.