ArticleCureus2020
Effectiveness of High-Fidelity Simulation in Training Emergency Medicine Physicians in Point of Care Ultrasonography in Pakistan: A Quasi-Experimental Study.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- From concepts to evaluation: mapping approaches to POCUS training assessment in low- and middle-income countries - a systematic scoping review.The ultrasound journal · 2026Article
- Concepts for point-of-care ultrasound training in low resource settings: a scoping review.The ultrasound journal · 2025Review
- A Scoping Review of Quasi-experimental Studies on Simulation-Based Learning in Medical Education: Trends and Insights from the Last Decade.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Review
- A Scoping Review of Pakistani Healthcare Simulation: Insights for Lower-Middle-Income Countries.Cureus · 2024Review
- The ultrasound use of simulators, current view, and perspectives: Requirements and technical aspects (WFUMB state of the art paper).Endoscopic ultrasoundReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is frequently utilized in emergency medicine (EM), with an extended-focused assessment with sonography in trauma (e-FAST) being the most widely used PoCUS modality. This modality is not only time- and cost-efficient, but it is highly accurate in the diagnosis and management of surgical patients in the emergency department, as well as being highly predictive of patient outcomes. Targeted training is essential to ensure a learner's confidence in image acquisition, interpretation, and translation of knowledge to making clinical decisions. High-fidelity simulation offers a uniquely safe and "mistake-forgiving" environment to teach and train medical professionals. The present study evaluated the effectiveness of a high-fidelity simulator to train EM physicians in e-FAST at a tertiary care teaching hospital in a lower-middle-income country. Methods This quasi-experimental study was performed at a state-of-the-art simulation center of a multidisciplinary university hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Subjects were included if they were EM physicians who volunteered to participate and were available for the entire training and testing period. The educational intervention included lectures and hands-on practice on a high-fidelity simulator (SonoSim, Santa Monica, CA). Knowledge and image interpretation on e-FAST were evaluated using a questionnaire, administered before and after the training course. Each participant's ability to acquire and interpret satisfactory images was assessed by experienced EM physicians and recorded. Participants were also administered a needs assessment survey and a course evaluation. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). All the tests were two-sided, and p-values ≤0.05 were considered significant. Baseline characteristics and outcome variables were recorded and compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results A total of 31 EM physicians, 12 (38.7%) men and 19 (61.3%) women, were enrolled in the study, with 24 (77.3%) having one to three years of EM experience. Mean and percentage group performance improved from 6 and 40% before the intervention to 14.5 and 96.6% after the intervention (Z=4.867, p≤0.05). Most improvement in image acquisition on high-fidelity simulation was observed in the upper right quadrant of the suprapubic window (29/31; 93.5%), followed by the upper left quadrant (27/31; 87%) and the subxiphoid window (21/31; 67%). All 31 participants reported improvements in comfort and confidence level with PoCUS after attending the workshop. Conclusions EM physicians who attended a brief workshop incorporating simulation demonstrated improvements in knowledge and image acquisition skills in all domains tested. High-fidelity simulation training is an effective modality for training EM physicians in e-FAST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.