Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32699649›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of learning2020

An fMRI study of error monitoring in Montessori and traditionally-schooled children.

Solange Denervaud, Eleonora Fornari, Xiao-Fei Yang, Patric Hagmann, Mary Helen Immordino-Yang, David Sander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of learning, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Educating minds with generative AI.Communications psychology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Transcendent thinking counteracts longitudinal effects of mid-adolescent exposure to community violence in the anterior cingulate cortex.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Article
  7. Active inference goes to school: the importance of active learning in the age of large language models.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. LearningBrain sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Solange DenervaudSwiss Center for Affective Sciences (CISA), Campus Biotech, University of Geneva, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8627-5766
Eleonora FornariBiomedical Imaging Center (CIBM), Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Xiao-Fei YangCenter for Affective Neuroscience, Development, Learning and Education (CANDLE); Brain and Creativity Institute, Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7586-4573
Patric HagmannConnectomics Lab, Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mary Helen Immordino-Yang *Center for Affective Neuroscience, Development, Learning and Education (CANDLE); Brain and Creativity Institute, Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2875-4977
David Sander *Swiss Center for Affective Sciences (CISA), Campus Biotech, University of Geneva, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1266-9361

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of error monitoring is central to learning and academic achievement. However, few studies exist on the neural correlates of children's error monitoring, and no studies have examined its susceptibility to educational influences. Pedagogical methods differ on how they teach children to learn from errors. Here, 32 students (aged 8-12 years) from high-quality Swiss traditional or Montessori schools performed a math task with feedback during fMRI. Although the groups' accuracies were similar, Montessori students skipped fewer trials, responded faster and showed more neural activity in right parietal and frontal regions involved in math processing. While traditionally-schooled students showed greater functional connectivity between the ACC, involved in error monitoring, and hippocampus following correct trials, Montessori students showed greater functional connectivity between the ACC and frontal regions following incorrect trials. The findings suggest that pedagogical experience influences the development of error monitoring and its neural correlates, with implications for neurodevelopment and education.

Indexed as

Human behaviourProblem solving

Identifiers

PMID32699649
PMCPMC7367880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.