ArticleClinical kidney journal2020
Blood pressure targets in patients with chronic kidney disease: MDRD and AASK now confirming SPRINT.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ambulatory blood pressure trajectories and blood pressure variability in kidney transplant recipients: a comparative study against haemodialysis patients.Clinical kidney journal · 2022Article
- COVID-19 in Chronic Kidney Disease: The Impact of Old and Novel Cardiovascular Risk Factors.Blood purification · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent American and European hypertension guidelines are not in agreement regarding blood pressure (BP) targets for persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Previous analyses from the African American Study on Kidney Disease (AASK) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) trials suggested that strict BP control confers nephroprotection for patients with proteinuria, but a mortality benefit was not apparent. In contrast, an analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) subpopulation of CKD patients showed a mortality benefit with the systolic blood pressure (SBP) <120 mmHg versus the SBP <140 target. A recent analysis of the combined MDRD and AASK cohorts supports previous evidence on nephroprotection but also findings from the SPRINT trial on all-cause mortality benefits of intensive versus usual BP control in individuals with CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.