Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32699555›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2020

Deep learning methods improve linear B-cell epitope prediction.

Tao Liu, Kaiwen Shi, Wuju Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. PhIP-Seq: methods, applications and challenges.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Multi-perspectives and challenges in identifying B-cell epitopes.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Review
  16. LBCE-XGB: A XGBoost Model for Predicting Linear B-Cell Epitopes Based on BERT Embeddings.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Prediction of Linear B Cell Epitopes in Proteins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tao Liu *Institute of Military Cognition and Brain Sciences, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Taiping Road 27, Haidian district, Beijing, 100850 China.
Kaiwen Shi *Institute of Military Cognition and Brain Sciences, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Taiping Road 27, Haidian district, Beijing, 100850 China.
Wuju LiInstitute of Military Cognition and Brain Sciences, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Taiping Road 27, Haidian district, Beijing, 100850 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundB-cell epitopes play important roles in vaccine design, clinical diagnosis, and antibody production. Although some models have been developed to predict linear or conformational B-cell epitopes, their performance is still unsatisfactory. Hundreds of thousands of linear B-cell epitope data have accumulated in the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB). These data can be explored using the deep learning methods, in order to create better predictive models for linear B-cell epitopes.

resultsAfter data cleaning, we obtained 240,563 peptide samples with experimental evidence from the IEDB database, including 25,884 linear B-cell epitopes and 214,679 non-epitopes. Based on the peptide center, we adapted each peptide to the same length by trimming or extending. A random portion of the data, with the same amount of epitopes and non-epitopes, were set aside as test dataset. Then a same number of epitopes and non-epitopes were randomly selected from the remaining data to build a classifier with the feedforward deep neural network. We built eleven classifiers to form an ensemble prediction model. The model will report a peptide as an epitope if it was classified as epitope by all eleven classifiers. Then we used the test data set to evaluate the performance of the model using the area value under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) as an indicator. We established 40 models to predict linear B-cell epitopes of length from 11 to 50 separately, and found that the AUC value increased with the length and tended to be stable when the length was 38. Repeated results showed that the models constructed by this method were robust. Tested on our and two public test datasets, our models outperformed current major models available.

conclusionsWe applied the feedforward deep neural network to the large amount of linear B-cell epitope data with experimental evidence in the IEDB database, and constructed ensemble prediction models with better performance than the current major models available. We named the models as DLBEpitope and provided web services using the models at http://ccb1.bmi.ac.cn:81/dlbepitope/.

Indexed as

Deep learningLinear B-cell epitopePrediction

Identifiers

PMID32699555
PMCPMC7371472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.