ArticleCancer cell international2020
Establishment of a novel cell cycle-related prognostic signature predicting prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Induction chemotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer: long-term results and exploratory analyses of a randomized controlled trial.The oncologist · 2025Trial
- Article
- Cell Cycle-Based Molecular Features via Synthetic Lethality and Non-Coding RNA Interactions in Cancer.Genes · 2025Article
- Analysis and experimental validation of disulfidptosis related genes solute carrier family 3 member 2 (SLC3A2) in endometrial cancer.Cancer cell international · 2024Article
- TiRNA-Gly-GCC-002 is associated with progression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Single-cell transcriptome profiles the heterogeneity of tumor cells and microenvironments for different pathological endometrial cancer and identifies specific sensitive drugs.Cell death & disease · 2024Article
- Comprehensive analysis of a NAD+ metabolism-derived gene signature to predict the prognosis and immune landscape in endometrial cancer.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Identification of Potentially Novel Molecular Targets of Endometrial Cancer Using a Non-Biased Proteomic Approach.Cancers · 2023Article
- Article
- An Individualized Prognostic Model in Patients with Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Serum Metabolomic Profiling.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A cell cycle-related lncRNA signature predicts the progression-free interval in papillary thyroid carcinoma.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Three RNA-binding protein signature as a novel biomarker to predict endometrial cancer prognosis.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- The role of m6A demethylases in lung cancer: diagnostic and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Article
- Crosstalk of Redox-Related Subtypes, Establishment of a Prognostic Model and Immune Responses in Endometrial Carcinoma.Cancers · 2022Article
- Article
- Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis of Serine Racemase as an Independent Prognostic Biomarker in Endometrial Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- The Metabolic and Non-Metabolic Roles of UCK2 in Tumor Progression.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- An immune-related pseudogene signature to improve prognosis prediction of endometrial carcinoma patients.Biomedical engineering online · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndometrial cancer (EnCa) ranks fourth in menace within women's malignant tumors. Large numbers of studies have proven that functional genes can change the process of tumors by regulating the cell cycle, thereby achieving the goal of targeted therapy.
methodsThe transcriptional data of EnCa samples obtained from the TCGA database was analyzed. A battery of bioinformatics strategies, which included GSEA, Cox and LASSO regression analysis, establishment of a prognostic signature and a nomogram for overall survival (OS) assessment. The GEPIA and CPTAC analysis were applied to validate the dysregulation of hub genes. For mutation analysis, the "maftools" package was used.
resultsGSEA identified that cell cycle was the most associated pathway to EnCa. Five cell cycle-related genes including HMGB3, EZH2, NOTCH2, UCK2 and ODF2 were identified as prognosis-related genes to build a prognostic signature. Based on this model, the EnCa patients could be divided into low- and high-risk groups, and patients with high-risk score exhibited poorer OS. Time-dependent ROC and Cox regression analyses revealed that the 5-gene signature could predict EnCa prognosis exactly and independently. GEPIA and CPTAC validation exhibited that these genes were notably dysregulated between EnCa and normal tissues. Lower mutation rates of PTEN, TTN, ARID1A, and etc. were found in samples with high-risk score compared with that with low-risk score. GSEA analysis suggested that the samples of the low- and high-risk groups were concentrated on various pathways, which accounted for the different oncogenic mechanisms in patients in two groups.
conclusionThe current research construct a 5-gene signature to evaluate prognosis of EnCa patients, which may innovative clinical application of prognostic assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.