Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32699431›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of ecology2020

Rhizosphere and litter feedbacks to range-expanding plant species and related natives.

Marta Manrubia, Wim H van der Putten, Carolin Weser, Ciska G F Veen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marta ManrubiaDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW) Wageningen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7058-4844
Wim H van der PuttenDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW) Wageningen The Netherlands.
Carolin WeserDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW) Wageningen The Netherlands.
Ciska G F VeenDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW) Wageningen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7736-9998
Netherlands Institute of Ecology · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-soil feedback (PSF) results from the net legacy effect that plants leave in the composition of soil communities and abiotic soil properties. PSF is induced by the rhizosphere and by litter inputs into the soil, however, we have little understanding of their individual contributions. Here, we examine feedback effects from the rhizosphere of living plants, decomposing litter and their combination.We used four pairs of climate warming-induced range-expanding plant species and congeneric natives, and examined PSF effects on plant biomass production, as well as on decomposition in their new range.We tested the hypothesis that the plant rhizosphere provides less negative feedback to range-expanders than to the congeneric natives, and that feedback mediated by litter decomposition does not provide such a difference because decomposers might be less specialized than pathogens. To determine PSF, we used soil from the congener species within each pair as an 'away' soil to indicate whether range-expanders may have lost their specialized soil biota upon arrival in the novel range.Our results show that although range-expanding plant species and their congeneric natives developed neutral PSF in both rhizosphere- and litter-conditioned soils, two of the four range-expanders produced more biomass than natives in soils conditioned by litter, that is, soils with high nutrient content. Shoot litter from two out of four range-expanding species decomposed more than that of natives, but decomposition was unaffected by soil conditioning.

Indexed as

litter feedbacknovel communitiesplant range expansionplant–soil feedbackrhizosphere feedback

Identifiers

PMID32699431
PMCPMC7363160
OpenAlexW2976616012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.