ArticleScientific reports2020
Improving prediction of rare species' distribution from community data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing Habitat Suitability and Exposure of the EndemicEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Biological traits, distribution patterns and spatial segregation of common and rare batoids in the North Aegean Sea, Greece.Journal of fish biology · 2026Article
- Informing spatial conservation prioritization with species' traits.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
- Zooming In: Assessing the Transferability of SDMs From Large to Small Spatial Extents.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Prediction of Potential Suitable Habitats forEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Common to rare transfer learning (CORAL) enables inference and prediction for a quarter million rare Malagasy arthropods.Nature methods · 2025Article
- Data fusion and integrated species distribution models for three endangered ferns (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Combining environmental DNA and visual surveys can inform conservation planning for coral reefs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Verification study on how macrofungal fruitbody formation can be predicted by artificial neural network.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- MaxEnt and Marxan modeling to predict the potential habitat and priority planting areas ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Ecological niche models reveal divergent habitat use of Pallas's cat in the Eurasian cold steppes.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Models of spatial analysis for vector-borne diseases studies: A systematic review.Veterinary world · 2022Article
- Automatic variable selection in ecological niche modeling: A case study using Cassin's Sparrow (Peucaea cassinii).PloS one · 2022Article
- The use of singlebeam echo-sounder depth data to produce demersal fish distribution models that are comparable to models produced using multibeam echo-sounder depth.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Species distribution models (SDMs) have been increasingly used to predict the geographic distribution of a wide range of organisms; however, relatively fewer research efforts have concentrated on rare species despite their critical roles in biological conservation. The present study tested whether community data may improve modelling rare species by sharing information among common and rare ones. We chose six SDMs that treat community data in different ways, including two traditional single-species models (random forest and artificial neural network) and four joint species distribution models that incorporate species associations implicitly (multivariate random forest and multi-response artificial neural network) or explicitly (hierarchical modelling of species communities and generalized joint attribute model). In addition, we evaluated two approaches of data arrangement, species filtering and conditional prediction, to enhance the selected models. The model predictions were tested using cross validation based on empirical data collected from marine fisheries surveys, and the effects of community data were evaluated by comparing models for six selected rare species. The results demonstrated that the community data improved the predictions of rare species' distributions to certain extent but might also be unhelpful in some cases. The rare species could be appropriately predicted in terms of occurrence, whereas their abundance tended to be underestimated by most models. Species filtering and conditional predictions substantially benefited the predictive performances of multiple- and single-species models, respectively. We conclude that both the modelling algorithms and community data need to be carefully selected in order to deliver improvement in modelling rare species. The study highlights the opportunity and challenges to improve prediction of rare species' distribution by making the most of community data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.