Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32699309›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2020

Clinical development and potential of photothermal and photodynamic therapies for cancer.

Xingshu Li, Jonathan F Lovell, Juyoung Yoon, Xiaoyuan Chen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,021 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,021citing papers in PubMed
134.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,021 citing papers in PubMed, 3,264 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A photothermal ablation strategy for orthotopic ovarian cancerInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Sulfur Vacancy-Enriched CuAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

961 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Xingshu LiCollege of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China.
Jonathan F LovellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. jflovell@buffalo.edu.
Juyoung YoonDepartment of Chemistry and Nanoscience, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. jyoon@ewha.ac.kr.
Xiaoyuan ChenLaboratory of Molecular Imaging and Nanomedicine (LOMIN), National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MA, USA. shawn.chen@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9622-0870
Buffalo State University · USEwha Womans University · KRFuzhou University · CNNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Light-Triggered Drug Release in Primed Pancreatic TumorsR01EB017270 · NIBIB · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI LOVELL, JONATHAN F · 2013 to 2021
$3.5M
Targeting Tumors with Resealable Nanovesicles Permeabilized by NIR LightDP5OD017898 · OD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI LOVELL, JONATHAN F · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017270NIH HHS DP5 OD017898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light-activated, photosensitizer-based therapies have been established as safe modalities of tumour ablation for numerous cancer indications. Two main approaches are available: photodynamic therapy, which results in localized chemical damage in the target lesions, and photothermal therapy, which results in localized thermal damage. Whereas the administration of photosensitizers is a key component of photodynamic therapy, exogenous photothermal contrast agents are not required for photothermal therapy but can enhance the efficiency and efficacy of treatment. Over the past decades, great strides have been made in the development of phototherapeutic drugs and devices as cancer treatments, but key challenges have restricted their widespread clinical use outside of certain dermatological indications. Improvements in the tumour specificity of photosensitizers, achieved through targeting or localized activation, could provide better outcomes with fewer adverse effects, as could combinations with chemotherapies or immunotherapies. In this Review, we provide an overview of the current clinical progress of phototherapies for cancer and discuss the emerging preclinical bioengineering approaches that have the potential to overcome challenges in this area and thus improve the efficiency and utility of such treatments.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHumansNanotechnologyNeoplasmsPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsPhotothermal TherapyResearch DesignTreatment OutcomePhotosensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID32699309
OpenAlexW3044858173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.