ArticleScientific reports2020
Molecular markers from the chloroplast genome of rose provide a complementary tool for variety discrimination and profiling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing chloroplast genomes of Tulipa species: genome evolution and phylogenomic implications.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Mitochondrial genome-derived microsatellites reveal genetic diversity and population structure in Callery pear populations.PloS one · 2026Article
- Chloroplast genome, an effective strategy for identifying hybrid species, using Dendrobium 'Black Gold' as an example.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Comparative plastomes of fiveAoB PLANTS · 2025Article
- Characterization of the FourGenes · 2025Article
- Plastid genomic features and phylogenetic placement in Rosa (Rosaceae) through comparative analysis.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Harnessing chloroplast SSRs to decipher genetic diversity in underutilizedFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Chloroplast genomic diversity in eleven Pennisetum species.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome ofEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- PhytoKeys · 2024Article
- The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024Article
- Whole chloroplast genome-specific non-synonymous SNPs reveal the presence of substantial diversity in the pigeonpea mini-core collection.3 Biotech · 2023Article
- Article
- The Chloroplast Genome of Endive (Genes · 2023Article
- DBALM: A novel method for identifying ornamental flowering plants based on DNA barcodes-leaf morphology.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Comparative analysis of 17 complete chloroplast genomes reveals intraspecific variation and relationships amongFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023Article
- Insights into chloroplast genome structure and phylogenetic relationships within theFrontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Comparative chloroplast genome analyses of Amomum: insights into evolutionary history and species identification.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rose is one of the most important ornamental woody plants because of its extensive use and high economic value. Herein, we sequenced a complete chloroplast genome of the miniature rose variety Rosa 'Margo Koster' and performed comparative analyses with sequences previously published for other species in the Rosaceae family. The chloroplast genome of Rosa 'Margo Koster', with a size of 157,395 bp, has a circular quadripartite structure typical of angiosperm chloroplast genomes and contains a total of 81 protein-coding genes, 30 tRNA genes and 4 rRNA genes. Conjunction regions in the chloroplast genome of Rosa 'Margo Koster' were verified and manually corrected by Sanger sequencing. Comparative genome analysis showed that the IR contraction and expansion events resulted in rps19 and ycf1 pseudogenes. The phylogenetic analysis within the Rosa genus showed that Rosa 'Margo Koster' is closer to Rosa odorata than to other Rosa species. Additionally, we identified and screened highly divergent sequences and cpSSRs and compared their power to discriminate rose varieties by Sanger sequencing and capillary electrophoresis. The results showed that 15 cpSSRs are polymorphic, but their discriminating power is only moderate among a set of rose varieties. However, more than 150 single nucleotide variations (SNVs) were discovered in the flanking region of cpSSRs, and the results indicated that these SNVs have a higher divergence and stronger power for profiling rose varieties. These findings suggest that nucleotide mutations in the chloroplast genome may be an effective and powerful tool for rose variety discrimination and DNA profiling. These molecular markers in the chloroplast genome sequence of Rosa spp. will facilitate population and phylogenetic studies and other related studies of this species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.