Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32699204›Full record

SynthesisRevista espanola de salud publica2020

[Impact of SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) on the mental health of healthcare professionals: a systematic review.]

Juan Jesús García-Iglesias, Juan Gómez-Salgado, Jorge Martín-Pereira, Javier Fagundo-Rivera, Diego Ayuso-Murillo, José Ramón Martínez-Riera, Carlos Ruiz-Frutos

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Revista espanola de salud publica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juan Jesús García-IglesiasDepartamento de Sociología, Trabajo Social y Salud Pública. Universidad de Huelva. Huelva. España.
Juan Gómez-SalgadoDepartamento de Sociología, Trabajo Social y Salud Pública. Universidad de Huelva. Huelva. España.
Jorge Martín-PereiraConsorcio de transporte sanitario onubense. Base en Centro de Salud de Isla Cristina. Huelva. España.
Javier Fagundo-RiveraEscuela Superior de Salud. Universidade Atlântica. Lisboa. Portugal.
Diego Ayuso-MurilloConsejo General de Enfermería de España. Madrid. España.
José Ramón Martínez-RieraDepartamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Universidad de Alicante. Alicante. España.
Carlos Ruiz-FrutosDepartamento de Sociología, Trabajo Social y Salud Pública. Universidad de Huelva. Huelva. España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn times of this global pandemic situation, population's mental health is compromised, especially in those groups that are at the forefront of defence against the virus such as healthcare professionals. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak on healthcare professionals' mental health.

methodsA systematic review was carried out following the PRISMA format in Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO and ScienceDirect electronic databases between January and May 2020. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools for non-randomized studies.

resultsA total of 13 studies were included in this review. Professionals' mental health and mental functions were compromised, being especially affected those professionals on the front line of battle against the virus. However, these stats were below the general population data. Although there is wide variability of results, medium-high levels of anxiety (26,5%-44,6%), depression (8,1%-25%), concern and insomnia are detected (23,6%-38%). Paradoxically, stress levels were below expectations (3,8%-68,3%).

conclusionsThe mental well-being of health professionals working on the front line is compromised in times of pandemic by presenting medium-high levels of anxiety, depression, nervousness and insomnia, and, to a lesser extent, stress.

Indexed as

AnxietyBetacoronavirusBurnout, ProfessionalCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Delivery of Health CareDepressionHealth PersonnelHumansMental HealthOccupational HealthPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Sleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersSpainAnxietyDepressionHealth personnelMental healthPandemicProfessional burnoutPsychological stressSARS-CoV-2Spain

Identifiers

PMID32699204
PMCPMC11582971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.