Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32699181›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2020

M1

Eva M Garrido-Martin, Toby W P Mellows, James Clarke, Anusha-Preethi Ganesan, Oliver Wood, Angelica Cazaly, Gregory Seumois, Serena J Chee, Aiman Alzetani, Emma V King and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 188 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Identification of a distinct cluster of LY6EBritish journal of cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva M Garrido-MartinClinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.
Toby W P MellowsClinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.
James ClarkeLa Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA.
Anusha-Preethi GanesanLa Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA.
Oliver WoodCancer Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.
Angelica CazalyCancer Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.
Gregory SeumoisLa Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA.
Serena J CheeCancer Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.
Aiman AlzetaniSouthampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3373-6714
Emma V KingCancer Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.
Catherine C HedrickInflammatory Biology, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA.
Gareth ThomasCancer Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.
Peter S FriedmannClinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.
Christian Hermann OttensmeierCancer Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3619-1657
Pandurangan Vijayanand *Division of Vaccine Discovery, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA.
Tilman Sanchez-Elsner *Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK T.Sanchez-Elsner@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1915-2410
University of Southampton · GBLa Jolla Institute for Immunology · US

Funding

Functions of Nonclassical Monocytes in the VasculatureR01CA202987 · NCI · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI HEDRICK, CATHERINE C · 2016 to 2020
$2.2M
Mechanisms underlying tumor-infiltrating tissue resident memory T cell generation and maintenanceK08CA230164 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GANESAN, ANUSHA PREETHI · 2019 to 2023
$1.4M
Protective Role of Nonclassical Monocytes in Immunotherapies for Solid CancersU01CA224766 · NCI · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI HEDRICK, CATHERINE C, KAPLAN, ROSANDRA · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
Illumina HiSeq 2500 Sequencing SystemS10OD016262 · OD · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI RAO, ANJANA · 2013 to 2013
$600k
FACSAria II Cell SorterS10RR027366 · NCRR · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI CROFT, MICHAEL · 2011 to 2011
$514k
Cancer Research UK 21998Cancer Research UK 22100Cancer Research UK C11512/A20256Cancer Research UK C30718/A22100Cancer Research UK C491/A15951Department of HealthNCI NIH HHS K08 CA230164NCI NIH HHS R01 CA202987NCI NIH HHS U01 CA224766NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027366NIH HHS S10 OD016262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in determining the outcome between the antitumor effects of the adaptive immune system and the tumor's anti-immunity stratagems, is controversial. Macrophages modulate their activities and phenotypes by integration of signals in the tumor microenvironment. Depending on how macrophages are activated, they may adopt so-called M1-like, antitumor or M2-like, protumor profiles. In many solid tumors, a dominance of M2-like macrophages is associated with poor outcomes but in some tumor types, strong M1-like profiles are linked to better outcomes. We aimed to investigate the interrelationship of these TAM populations to establish how they modulate the efficacy of the adaptive immune system in early lung cancer.

methodsMacrophages from matched lung (non-tumor-associated macrophages (NTAMs)) and tumor samples (TAMs) from resected lung cancers were assessed by bulk and single-cell transcriptomic analysis. Protein expression of genes characteristic of M1-like (chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9) or M2-like (matrix metallopeptidase 12) functions was confirmed by confocal microscopy. Immunohistochemistry related the distribution of TAM transcriptomic signatures to density of CD8

resultsTAMs have significantly different transcriptomic profiles from NTAMs with >1000 differentially expressed genes. TAMs displayed a strong M2-like signature with no significant variation between patients. However, single-cell RNA-sequencing supported by immuno-stained cells revealed that additionally, in 25% of patients the M2-like TAMs also co-expressed a strong/hot M1-like signature (M1

conclusionsWe showed that in early lung cancer, expression of M1-like and M2-like gene signatures are not mutually exclusive since the same TAMs can simultaneously display both gene-expression profiles. The presence of M1

Indexed as

FemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleSurvival AnalysisT-LymphocytesTumor-Associated Macrophagesimmunityimmunity, innatelung neoplasmsmacrophages

Identifiers

PMID32699181
PMCPMC7375465
OpenAlexW3044374823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.