ReviewBMJ case reports2020
Ectopic lacrimal gland in the lacrimal sac mimicking tumour: literature review.
Review in BMJ case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Histopathologically Proven Tarsal Lacrimal Gland Choristoma.Beyoglu eye journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An 80-year-old man referred with repeated episode of dacryocystitis from the left lacrimal drainage system and palpable swelling. For many years, he has being presented with epiphora unilaterally with chronic dacryocystitis. Investigations with dye-test revealed subocclusion of the natural passage of the tears, and CT and MRI scans revealed solid mass in the lacrimal sac. The lacrimal sac was opened by endonasal endoscopic approach, the sacral mass was identified and completely removed. The histopathological examination showed lacrimal gland in ectopic position. Patient followed for 18 months with complete recovery of symptoms. In our differential diagnosis, the ectopic lacrimal gland is also identified, when a mass in the lacrimal sac and duct is present. Successful surgical excision required considerable multidisciplinary teamwork between ophtalmologist-ENT (Otolaryngologist) and radiologist. Endonasal endoscopic approach is perfectly safe with direct control and ensures a smooth postoperative recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.