Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32699043›Full record

SynthesisRMD open2020

Management of lupus nephritis: a systematic literature review informing the 2019 update of the joint EULAR and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations.

Myrto Kostopoulou, Antonis Fanouriakis, Kim Cheema, John Boletis, George Bertsias, David Jayne, Dimitrios T Boumpas

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in RMD open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. [Diagnostic and therapy of lupus nephritis - 2023].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Myrto Kostopoulou *Department of Nephrology, "G. Gennimatas" General Hospital, Athens, Greece boumpasd@uoc.gr.
Antonis Fanouriakis *Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, General University Hospital Attikon, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2696-031X
Kim CheemaDepartment of Medicine, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
John BoletisDepartment of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Unit, "Laikon" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece.
George BertsiasRheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece.
David JayneDepartment of Medicine, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Dimitrios T BoumpasRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, General University Hospital Attikon, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9812-4671
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity of Cambridge · GBGeneral Hospital Asklepieio Voulas · GRUniversity Hospital of Heraklion · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyse the current evidence for the management of lupus nephritis (LN) informing the 2019 update of the EULAR/European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association recommendations.

methodsAccording to the EULAR standardised operating procedures, a PubMed systematic literature review was performed, from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018. Since this was an update of the 2012 recommendations, the final level of evidence (LoE) and grading of recommendations considered the total body of evidence, including literature prior to 2012.

resultsWe identified 387 relevant articles. High-quality randomised evidence supports the use of immunosuppressive treatment for class III and class IV LN (LoE 1a), and moderate-level evidence supports the use of immunosuppressive treatment for pure class V LN with nephrotic-range proteinuria (LoE 2b). Treatment should aim for at least 25% reduction in proteinuria at 3 months, 50% at 6 months and complete renal response (<500-700 mg/day) at 12 months (LoE 2a-2b). High-quality evidence supports the use of mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid (MMF/MPA) or low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (CY) as initial treatment of active class III/IV LN (LoE 1a). Combination of tacrolimus with MMF/MPA and high-dose CY are alternatives in specific circumstances (LoE 1a). There is low-quality level evidence to guide optimal duration of immunosuppression in LN (LoE 3). In end-stage kidney disease, all methods of kidney replacement treatment can be used, with transplantation having the most favourable outcomes (LoE 2b).

conclusionsThere is high-quality evidence to guide the initial and subsequent phases of class III/IV LN treatment, but low-to-moderate quality evidence to guide treatment of class V LN, monitoring and optimal duration of immunosuppression.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBiopsyCalcineurinClinical Decision-MakingDisease ManagementDisease SusceptibilityDrug ResistanceHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidneyKidney Failure, ChronicLupus NephritisMolecular Targeted TherapyPractice Guidelines as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersCalcineurinImmunosuppressive AgentsLupus ErythematosusLupus NephritisSystemicTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID32699043
PMCPMC7425195
OpenAlexW3044629668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.