Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32698825›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

The association between Asian patient race/ethnicity and lower satisfaction scores.

Lillian Liao, Sukyung Chung, Jonathan Altamirano, Luis Garcia, Magali Fassiotto, Bonnie Maldonado, Paul Heidenreich, Latha Palaniappan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lillian LiaoDepartment of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA. ll3265@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0246-4592
Sukyung ChungPalo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, USA.
Jonathan AltamiranoOffice of Faculty Development and Diversity, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Luis GarciaOffice of Faculty Development and Diversity, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Magali FassiottoOffice of Faculty Development and Diversity, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Bonnie MaldonadoOffice of Faculty Development and Diversity, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Paul HeidenreichDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Latha PalaniappanDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient satisfaction is increasingly being used to assess, and financially reward, provider performance. Previous studies suggest that race/ethnicity (R/E) may impact satisfaction, yet few practices adjust for patient R/E. The objective of this study is to examine R/E differences in patient satisfaction ratings and how these differences impact provider rankings.

methodsPatient satisfaction survey data linked to electronic health records from two large outpatient centers in northern California - a non-profit organization of community-based clinics (Site A) and an academic medical center (Site B) - was collected and analyzed. Participants consisted of adult patients who received outpatient care at Site A from December 2010 to November 2014 and Site B from March 2013 to August 2014, and completed Press-Ganey Medical Practice Survey questionnaires (N = 216,392 (Site A) and 30,690 (Site B)). Self-reported non-Hispanic white (NHW), Black, Latino, and Asian patients were studied. For six questions each representing a survey subdomain, favorable ratings were defined as top-box ("very good") compared to all other categories ("very poor," "poor," "fair," and "good"). Using multivariable logistic regression with provider random effects, we assessed whether the likelihood of giving favorable ratings differed by patient R/E, adjusting for patient age and sex.

resultsAsian, younger and female patients provided less favorable ratings than other R/E, older and male patients. After adjustment, Asian patients were less likely than NHW patients to provide top-box ratings to the overall assessment question "likelihood of recommending this practice to others" (Site A: Asian predicted probability (PP) 0.680, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.675-0.685 compared to NHW PP 0.820, 95% CI: 0.818-0.822; Site B: Asian PP 0.734, 95% CI: 0.733-0.736 compared to NHW PP 0.859, 95% CI: 0.859-0.859). The effect sizes for Asian R/E were greater than the effect sizes for older age and female sex. An absolute 3% decrease in mean composite score between providers serving different percentages of Asian patients translated to an absolute 40% drop in national ranking.

conclusionsPatient satisfaction scores may need to be adjusted for patient R/E, particularly for providers caring for high panel percentages of Asian patients.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAdolescentAdultAgedAmbulatory CareAsian PeopleCaliforniaCommunity Health CentersEthnicityFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionRacial GroupsCultural differencesPatient satisfactionRace/ethnicity

Identifiers

PMID32698825
PMCPMC7374891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.