ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2020
Myocardial strain analysis of the right ventricle: comparison of different cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiographic techniques.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recovery of right ventricular function and strain in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and concurrent chronic total occlusion.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Trial
- Clinical Applications of Right Ventricular Strain by Two-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- A Geometric Feature Tracking Approach for Noninvasive Patient-Specific Estimation of Leaflet Strain from 3D Images of Heart Valves.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Strain Analysis from Transverse CMR Cine Imaging in Congenital Heart Disease: Feasibility, Reproducibility, and Comparison to Global Longitudinal Strain.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exercise-induced out-of-proportion increase in afterload and impaired right ventricular contractile reserve in HFpEF.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Reproducibility assessment of biventricular strain derived from Long-Axis feature tracking in travelling Volunteers - A study in the Berlin research network for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (BER-CMR).The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- How we scan cardiac anatomy and function using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a practical video guide.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Comparison of Imaging Modalities for Left Ventricular Noncompaction Morphology.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Incremental Prognostic Value of Echocardiography Measures of Right Ventricular Systolic Function in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- The use of imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.Cardiology journal · 2025Review
- Passive biaxial mechanical properties of sheep myocardium.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Improve myocardial strain estimation based on deformable groupwise registration with a locally low-rank dissimilarity metric.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Functional Impairments in the Right Heart.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Interventricular septum involvement is related to right ventricular dysfunction in anterior STEMI patients without right ventricular infarction: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Use of Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography in Septic Cardiomyopathy in Critically Ill Children: A Narrative Review.Critical care explorations · 2024Review
- Right ventricular dyssynchrony for the prediction of prognosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus-aaociated pulmonary arterial hypertension: a study with two-dimensional speckle tracking.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Progress in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking for Evaluating Myocardial Strain in Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus.Current diabetes reviews · 2024Review
- Predictive value of cardiac magnetic resonance right ventricular longitudinal strain in patients with suspected myocarditis.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023Article
- Right Ventricular Strain by Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking Is Largely Afterload-Dependent and Does Not Reflect Contractility: Validation by Combined Volumetry and Invasive Pressure Tracings.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRight ventricular (RV) strain is a useful predictor of prognosis in various cardiovascular diseases, including those traditionally believed to impact only the left ventricle. We aimed to determine inter-modality and inter-technique agreement in RV longitudinal strain (LS) measurements between currently available cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and echocardiographic techniques, as well as their reproducibility and the impact of layer-specific strain measurements.
methodsRV-LS was determined in 62 patients using 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (STE, Epsilon) and two CMR techniques: feature tracking (FT) and strain-encoding (SENC), and in 17 healthy subjects using FT and SENC only. Measurements included global and free-wall LS (GLS, FWLS). Inter-technique agreement was assessed using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. Reproducibility was quantified using intraclass correlation (ICC) and coefficients of variation (CoV).
resultsWe found similar moderate agreement between both CMR techniques and STE in patients: r = 0.57-0.63 for SENC; r = 0.50-0.62 for FT. The correlation between SENC and STE was better for GLS (r = 0.63) than for FWLS (r = 0.57). Conversely, the correlation between FT and STE was higher for FWLS (r = 0.60-0.62) than GLS (r = 0.50-0.54). FT-midmyocardial strain correlated better with SENC and STE than FT-subendocardial strain. The agreement between SENC and FT was fair (r = 0.36-0.41, bias: - 6.4 to - 10.4%) in the entire study group. All techniques except FT showed excellent reproducibility (ICC: 0.62-0.96, CoV: 0.04-0.30).
conclusionsWe found only moderate inter-modality agreement with STE in RV-LS for both FT and SENC and poor agreement when comparing between the CMR techniques. Different modalities and techniques should not be used interchangeably to determine and monitor RV strain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.