ArticleBMC health services research2020
The influence of electronic health record use on collaboration among medical specialties.
Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electronic health records: managerial insights from an umbrella review.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Decision Support Systems for Healthcare Referral Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- The Analyzation of Change in Documentation due to the Introduction of Electronic Patient Records in Hospitals-A Systematic Review.Journal of medical systems · 2022Pooled it
- The Effect of the Electronic Health Record on Interprofessional Practice: A Systematic Review.Applied clinical informatics · 2022Pooled it
- Toward an Ethical Framework for the Text Mining of Social Media for Health Research: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in digital health · 2020Pooled it
- A Digital Registry and Education Network for Child Maltreatment Protection: Protocol for a Pilot Observational Exploratory Intervention Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Observational
- Article
- Challenges in Identifying Heart Failure Diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record.Journal of cardiac failure - intersections · 2026Article
- Let's talk to women, not about them: pregnant women's perspectives on integrated maternity care in the southwestern region of the Netherlands.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Nurses' and Patients' Perspectives on Care Coordination Across Health Care and Social Services Sectors: A Qualitative Study.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2026Article
- "We Get Stuck in our Own Little Bubbles": How Community Mental Healthcare Professionals Acknowledge their Role in Interorganizational Collaboration.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Portability of a text mining algorithm for detecting adverse drug reactions in electronic health records across diverse patient groups in two Dutch hospitals.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Assessing Health Care Professionals' Perceptions of a New System in Clinical Workflows: Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety-Based Consensual Qualitative Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Electronic Health Record Documentation Compliance in Multidisciplinary Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Access to cervical cancer care in sub-Saharan Africa: a narrative review of barriers and opportunities.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Accurately describing drug allergies and adverse drug reactions: The Australian Delphi Consensus on Drug Allergy Terminology.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- SMART: a new patient similarity estimation framework for enhanced predictive modeling in acute kidney injury.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Who will be our adult congenital heart disease patient tomorrow?European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Telemedicine and digital health: The future for pharmaceutical companies and health care.Indian journal of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne of the main objectives of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) is to enhance collaboration among healthcare professionals. However, our knowledge of how EHRs actually affect collaborative practices is limited. This study examines how an EHR facilitates and constrains collaboration in five outpatient clinics.
methodsWe conducted an embedded case study at five outpatient clinics of a Dutch hospital that had implemented an organization-wide EHR. Data were collected through interviews with representatives of medical specialties, administration, nursing, and management. Documents were analyzed to contextualize these data. We examined the following collaborative affordances of EHRs: (1) portability, (2) co-located access, (3) shared overviews, (4) mutual awareness, (5) messaging, and (6) orchestrating.
resultsOur findings demonstrate how an EHR will both facilitate and constrain collaboration among specialties and disciplines. Affordances that were inscribed in the system for collaboration purposes were not fully actualized in the hospital because: (a) The EHR helps health professionals coordinate patient care on an informed basis at any time and in any place but only allows asynchronous patient record use. (b) The comprehensive patient file affords joint clinical decision-making based on shared data, but specialty- and discipline-specific user-interfaces constrain mutual understanding of that data. Moreover, not all relevant information can be easily shared across specialties and outside the hospital. (c) The reduced necessity for face-to-face communication saves time but is experienced as hindering collective responsibility for a smooth workflow. (d) The EHR affords registration at the source and registration of activities through orders, but the heightened administrative burden for physicians and the strict authorization rules on inputting data constrain the flexible, multidisciplinary collaboration. (e) While the EHR affords a complete overview, information overload occurs due to the parallel generation of individually owned notes and the high frequency of asynchronous communication through messages of varying clinical priority.
conclusionsFor the optimal actualization of EHRs' collaborative affordances in hospitals, coordinated use of these affordances by health professionals is a prerequisite. Such coordinated use requires organizational, technical, and behavioral adaptations. Suggestions for hospital-wide policies to enhance trust in both the EHR and in its coordinated use for effective collaboration are offered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.