ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020
Parental understanding of crucial medical jargon used in prenatal prematurity counseling.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Communicating neurological prognosis in the prenatal period: a narrative review and practice guidelines.Pediatric research · 2025Guideline
- Through their eyes': A qualitative study on the impact of virtual reality on parents' understanding of visual impairment.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Effect of a Clear Communication Training on Medical Residents' Use of Jargon in Written Messages to Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bias and Disparities in Neonatal End-of-Life Care.NeoReviews · 2025Article
- Black women and the preemie prep for parents (P3) program: Exploratory analysis of a clinical trial.PEC innovation · 2024Article
- Mind the gap: Comparing parents' information needs about impending preterm birth to current clinical practices using a mixed methods approach.PEC innovation · 2024Article
- Exploring women's interpretations of survey questions on pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes: cognitive interviews in Iganga Mayuge, Uganda.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Smartphone-Based Video Antenatal Preterm Birth Education: The Preemie Prep for Parents Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA pediatrics · 2023Article
- Jargon Be Gone - Patient Preference in Doctor Communication.Journal of patient experience · 2023Article
- What's in a name? Laypeople's understanding of medical roles and titles.Journal of hospital medicine · 2022Article
- Accuracy in Patient Understanding of Common Medical Phrases.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Laypeople's interpretation of, and preference for, orthodontic images.Journal of orthodontics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundParent-clinician shared decision making is the recommended model for the care of premature infants; thus, clinicians provide prenatal prematurity counseling to parents in the event of a mother's hospitalization for premature birth. However, parental understanding of medical jargon commonly used during prematurity counseling is unknown.
methodsWithin an overall research agenda to develop and test an educational aid for prenatal prematurity education, we designed the Parental Knowledge of Premature Birth questionnaire. To evaluate parental comprehension of the medical jargon contained within the questionnaire, we conducted cognitive interviews, a formal method for evaluating comprehension and response to questionnaire items. Parents were recruited from a Level IV Neonatal Intensive Care Unit; purposeful recruitment ensured diversity with respect to gender, race, literacy level, and child's gestational age. Data collection and analysis followed standard qualitative methods for cognitive interviewing. We report on the insights gained from these cognitive interviews regarding parental understanding of crucial medical jargon commonly used during prenatal prematurity counseling.
resultsParticipants included 10 women and 6 men who ranged in age from 23 to 38 years and represented Black/African-American (38%), Asian (6%), and white (56%) backgrounds. Five participants (31%) had less than a high school education or reading level below 9th grade (Wide Range Achievement Test version 4 reading subtest). In the first round of interviews, parents of all education and literacy levels had difficulty with medical jargon commonly used in prematurity counseling. Terms that parents found difficult to understand included "gestational age", "mild or no developmental problems", and "neonatologist". Modified terms tested in a second round of interviews showed improved comprehension.
conclusionCognitive interviews provided empirical testing of parental understanding of crucial medical jargon and highlighted that language commonly used during prenatal prematurity counseling is not understood by many parents. For parents to participate in shared decision making, plain language should be used to maximize their understanding of medical information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.