Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32698766›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2020

Outcome impact of individualized fluid management during spine surgery: a before-after prospective comparison study.

Lu Che, Xiu H Zhang, Xu Li, Yue L Zhang, Li Xu, Yu G Huang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02470221 (Effect of Goal-Directed Intraoperative Fluid Therapy on Outcomes Following Laparotomy of Gynecological Malignancies and Orthopedic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02470221 completednot on this map

Effect of Goal-Directed Intraoperative Fluid Therapy on Outcomes Following Laparotomy of Gynecological Malignancies and Orthopedic Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorHuang YuGuangRan2016 to 2018Enrolled600ConditionsPostoperative Complications, Fluid OverloadArmsApplying goal-directed fluid therapy by continuous hemodynamic monitoring system, Conventional fluid therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lu CheDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100730, China.
Xiu H ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100730, China.
Xu LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yue L ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100730, China.
Li XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100730, China. pumchxuli@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5867-0651
Yu G HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100730, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividualized fluid management (IFM) has been shown to be useful to improve the postoperative outcome of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. A limited number of clinical studies have been done in orthopaedic patients and have yielded conflicting results. We designed the present study to investigate the clinical impact of IFM in patients undergoing major spine surgery.

methodsThis is a before-after study done in 300 patients undergoing posterior spine arthrodesis. Postoperative outcomes were compared between control group implementing standard fluid management (n = 150) and IFM group (n = 150) guided by fluid protocol based on continuous stroke volume monitoring and optimization. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients who developed one or more complications within 30 days following surgery.

resultsDuring surgery, patients received on average the same volume of crystalloids (7.4 vs 7.2 ml/kg/h) and colloids (1.6 vs 1.6 ml/kg/h) before and after the implementation of IFM. During 30 days following surgery, the proportion of patients who developed one or more complications was lower in the IFM group (32 vs 48%, p < 0.01). This difference was mainly explained by a significant decrease in post-operative nausea and vomiting (from 38 to 19%, p < 0.01), urinary tract infections (from 9 to 1%, p < 0.01) and surgical site infections (from 5 to 1%, p < 0.05). Median hospital length of stay was not affected by the implementation of IFM.

conclusionIn patients undergoing major spine surgery, the implementation of IFM was associated with a significant decrease in postoperative morbidity.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02470221 . Prospectively registered on June 12, 2015.

Indexed as

AdultAgedColloidsControlled Before-After StudiesCrystalloid SolutionsFemaleFluid TherapyHumansIntraoperative CareMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative Nausea and VomitingPrecision MedicineProspective StudiesSpinal FusionColloidsCrystalloid SolutionsIndividualized fluid managementOrthopaedic surgeryPostoperative outcomeSpine surgeryStroke volume

Identifiers

PMID32698766
PMCPMC7376681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.