Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32698601›Full record

ReviewCartilage2021

A Review of Current Management of Knee Hemarthrosis in the Non-Hemophilic Population.

Nikhil Potpally, Scott Rodeo, Paul So, Ken Mautner, Michael Baria, Gerard A Malanga

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cartilage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nikhil PotpallyRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4229-6690
Scott RodeoHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Paul SoRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Ken MautnerEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Michael BariaThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4351-9585
Gerard A MalangaRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8384-7036
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USEmory University · USHospital for Special Surgery · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The knee joint is one of the most frequently injured joints in the body, and the resulting injury may often lead to the presence of a bloody effusion, or hemarthrosis. The acute management of this condition can have long-lasting implications, and may ultimately result in the early onset of osteoarthritis in this population. Heme, a breakdown product of erythrocytes, and associated pro-inflammatory mediators, are known to have deleterious interactions with cartilage and synovium. The presence of blood in a joint following injury can precipitate these effects and accelerate the degenerative changes in the joint. Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal management of a traumatic knee joint injury with a hemarthrosis. Nontraumatic hemarthosis, seen most commonly in hemophilia patients, has a set of established guidelines that does not routinely recommend drainage of the joint. This article presents a rationale for joint aspiration to minimize the harmful effects of blood following traumatic hemarthrosis.

Indexed as

ArthrocentesisHemarthrosisHemophilia AHumansKnee InjuriesKnee JointSynovial Membranejoint injuryknee hemarthrosisposttraumatic osteoarthritisyouth

Identifiers

PMID32698601
PMCPMC8808899
OpenAlexW3044522510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.