Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32698443›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Qualitative and Semi-Quantitative Assessment of Processing-Related Surface Contamination of One- and Two-Piece CAD/CAM Abutments before and after Ultrasonic Cleaning.

Peter Gehrke, Cyrus Abazari, Kai Schlichter, Carsten Fischer, Dirk Duddeck, Georgios E Romanos, Paul Weigl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter GehrkeDepartment of Postgraduate Education, Master of Oral Implantology, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.
Cyrus AbazariPrivate Practice, Karl-Berner-Straße 23, 79400 Kandern, Germany.
Kai SchlichterPrivate Practice, Konrad-Lerch-Ring 9, 76877 Offenbach, Germany.
Carsten FischerSirius Ceramics, Lyoner Str. 44, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
Dirk DuddeckMedical Materials Research Institute, Max-Planck-Strasse 3, 12489 Berlin, Germany.
Georgios E RomanosDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.
Paul WeiglDepartment of Prosthodontics and Head of Department of Postgraduate Education, Master of Oral Implantology, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEMax Planck Institute for Medical Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manufacturing processes of custom implant abutments may contaminate their surfaces with micro wear deposits and generic pollutants. Such particulate debris, if not removed, might be detrimental and provoke inflammatory reactions in peri-implant tissues. Although regulatory guidelines for adequate cleaning, disinfection, or sterilization exist, there does not appear to be a consistent application and data on the amount and extent of such contaminants is lacking. The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the quality and quantity of processing-related surface contamination of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) abutments in the state of delivery and after ultrasonic cleaning. A total of 28 CAD/CAM monotype and hybrid abutments were cleaned and disinfected applying a three-stage ultrasonic protocol (Finevo protocol). Before and after cleaning, the chemical composition and the contamination of the abutments were assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and computer-aided planimetric measurement (CAPM). In the delivery condition, monotype abutments showed a significantly higher amount of debris compared to hybrid abutments (4.86 ± 6.10% vs. 0.03 ± 0.03%,

Indexed as

CAD/CAMcontaminationdebrisFinevohybrid abutmentmonotype abutmentplanimetric measurementultrasonic cleaning

Identifiers

PMID32698443
PMCPMC7412481
OpenAlexW3043270658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.