Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32698368›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Generation of Glioblastoma Patient-Derived Intracranial Xenografts for Preclinical Studies.

Amber E Kerstetter-Fogle, Peggy L R Harris, Susann M Brady-Kalnay, Andrew E Sloan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Modeling Brain Tumors: A Perspective Overview ofFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amber E Kerstetter-FogleDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Peggy L R HarrisDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Susann M Brady-KalnayCase Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Andrew E SloanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Case Western Reserve University · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · US

Funding

TUMOR METABOLISM PROGRAMP30CA043703 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK R CHANCE · 1987 to 2026
$142.3M
Ferry Foundation XXKaufman foundation XXXKimble foundation OSA120413NCI NIH HHS P30 CA043703Peter D. Cristal Chair in Neurosurgical Oncology 111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most malignant primary brain cancer affecting adults. Therapeutic options for GBM have remained the same for over a decade with no significant improvement. Many therapies that are successful in culture have failed in patients, likely due to the complex microenvironment in the brain, which has yet to be reproduced in any culture model. Furthermore, the high passage number of cultured cells and clonal selection fail to recapitulate the molecular and genomic signatures of GBM. We have established orthotopic patient-derived xenografts (PDX) from 37 GBM patients with human GBM. Of the 69 patient samples analyzed, we were successful in passaging 37 lines three or more generations (53.6%). After phenotypic characterization of the xenografted tumor tissue, two different growth patterns emerged highly invasive or localized. The phenotype was dependent on malignancy and previous treatment of the patient from which the xenograft was derived. Physiologically, mice exhibited symptoms more quickly with each subsequent passage, particularly in the localized tumors. Study of these physiologically relevant human xenografts in mice will enable therapeutic screenings in a microenvironment that more closely resembles GBM and may allow development of individualized patient models which may eventually be used for simulating treatment.

Indexed as

AgedAnimalsBrainBrain NeoplasmsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDMiddle AgedNeoplasm TransplantationTumor Cells, CulturedTumor MicroenvironmentXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysGBMintracranialpatient-derived xenograftpreclinical

Identifiers

PMID32698368
PMCPMC7403971
OpenAlexW3042796502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.