ArticleSports (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Predictors of CrossFit Open Performance.
Article in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute effect of a multi-ingredient pre-workout supplement on pacing and kinetic expression during shorter and longer bouts of high intensity functional training.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2025Trial
- Neuromuscular Profile of CrossFitJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- Block periodization vs. traditional periodization in high-intensity functional training: a randomized crossover study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Nutrition in CrossFit® - scientific evidence and practical perspectives: a systematic scoping review.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2025Article
- Integrative Physiological Strategies for Monitoring Demands in Functional Fitness.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Exploratory Analysis of the Correlations Between Physiological and Biomechanical Variables and Performance in the CrossFitJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- High Intensity Functional Training in Hybrid Competitions: A Scoping Review of Performance Models and Physiological Adaptations.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Review
- Workout Duration Alters the Importance of Predictive Traits on High-Intensity Functional Training Workout Performance.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sport-Related Injuries in Portuguese CrossFitMuscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The physical demands and physiological responses to CrossFit®: a scoping review with evidence gap map and meta-correlation.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Exploring the relationship between Total Athleticism score and CrossFit® Open Performance in amateur athletes: single measure involving body fat percentage, aerobic capacity, muscle power and local muscle endurance.European journal of translational myology · 2024Article
- The influence of sex-division, experience, and pacing strategy on performance in the 2020 CrossFit® Open.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Pacing Strategies Differ by Sex and Rank in 2020 CrossFitSports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- CrossFitSports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Normative Scores for CrossFitSports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Performance Sex Differences in CrossFitSports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Predicting the Clean Movement Technique in CrossfitInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- CrossFit® open performance is affected by the nature of past competition experiences.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Quantifying CrossFitFrontiers in sports and active living · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 2018 CrossFit Open (CFO) was the initial stage of an annual competition that consisted of five weekly workouts. Current evidence suggests that a variety of fitness parameters are important for progressing beyond this stage, but little is known about which are the most important. To examine relationships between CFO performance, experience, and physiological fitness, sixteen experienced (>2 years) athletes (30.7 ± 6.9 years, 171 ± 12 cm, 78.0 ± 16.2 kg) volunteered to provide information about their training and competitive history, and then complete a battery of physiological assessments prior to competing in the 2018 CFO. Athletes' resting energy expenditure, hormone concentrations, body composition, muscle morphology, cardiorespiratory fitness, and isometric strength were assessed on two separate occasions. Spearman correlations demonstrated significant (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.