Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32697806›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

How curricular changes influence medical students' perceptions of basic science: A pilot study.

Yousef Elfanagely, Joshua Ray Tanzer, Ricardo Pulido, Hanin Rashid, Liesel Copeland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yousef ElfanagelyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3056-3811
Joshua Ray TanzerDepartment of Biostatistics, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5393-2974
Ricardo PulidoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Hanin RashidDepartment of Psychiatry, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America.
Liesel CopelandDepartment of Education, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

theoryThe perceived value of study material may have implications on learning and long-term retention. This study compares the perceived value of basic science of medical students from schools with a traditional "2+2" curriculum and the USMLE Step 1 placed before core clerkships to those from medical schools that have undergone curricular revisions, resulting in shortened pre-clerkship curricula and administration of the USMLE Step 1 after core clerkships. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that differences in curricula, particularly duration of pre-clerkship curriculum and timing of the USMLE Step 1, affect medical students' perceived value of basic science.

methodsA twenty item anonymous questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale was developed to assess medical students' perceptions of basic science. The questionnaire was distributed to third-year medical students across four medical schools. Generalized linear models and p-values were calculated comparing the perceived value and use of basic science between medical schools with the USMLE Step 1 before clerkships and 2-years of basic science (BC) and medical schools with the USMLE Step 1 after core clerkships and 1.5-years of basic science (AC).

resultsThe questionnaire was distributed to 695 eligible students and completed by 287 students. Students at BC schools tended to view basic science as more essential for clinical practice than students at AC schools across both outcomes (rating independence of basic science and clinical practice, AC school mean = 2.97, BC school mean = 2.73, p = 0.0017; rating importance of basic science to clinical practice, AC school mean = 3.30, BC schools mean = 3.50, p = 0.0135).

conclusionsOur study suggests that students who have a longer basic science curriculum tend to value basic science greater than students with a shorter basic science curriculum. The timing of the USMLE Step 1 may also influence this relationship. Curricular decisions, such as reductions in pre-clerkship curricula and administration of the USMLE Step 1 after clerkships, may impact medical students' perceptions of the value of basic science to clinical practice. This can have implications on their future engagement with basic science and should be considered when modifying curriculum.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCurriculumLearningClinical ClerkshipEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansLicensure, MedicalPilot ProjectsSchools, MedicalStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID32697806
PMCPMC7375606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.