Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32697683›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2020

AnnotatorJ: an ImageJ plugin to ease hand annotation of cellular compartments.

Réka Hollandi, Ákos Diósdi, Gábor Hollandi, Nikita Moshkov, Péter Horváth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Democratizing Pathological Image Segmentation with Lay Annotators via Molecular-empowered Learning.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Réka HollandiSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Center, 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Ákos DiósdiSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Center, 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Gábor HollandiSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Center, 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Nikita MoshkovSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Center, 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Péter HorváthSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Center, 6726 Szeged, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AnnotatorJ combines single-cell identification with deep learning (DL) and manual annotation. Cellular analysis quality depends on accurate and reliable detection and segmentation of cells so that the subsequent steps of analyses, for example, expression measurements, may be carried out precisely and without bias. DL has recently become a popular way of segmenting cells, performing unimaginably better than conventional methods. However, such DL applications may be trained on a large amount of annotated data to be able to match the highest expectations. High-quality annotations are unfortunately expensive as they require field experts to create them, and often cannot be shared outside the lab due to medical regulations. We propose AnnotatorJ, an ImageJ plugin for the semiautomatic annotation of cells (or generally, objects of interest) on (not only) microscopy images in 2D that helps find the true contour of individual objects by applying U-Net-based presegmentation. The manual labor of hand annotating cells can be significantly accelerated by using our tool. Thus, it enables users to create such datasets that could potentially increase the accuracy of state-of-the-art solutions, DL or otherwise, when used as training data.

Indexed as

Data CurationDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftware

Identifiers

PMID32697683
PMCPMC7550707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.