Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32697674›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2020

Sex-Dependent Macromolecule and Nanoparticle Delivery in Experimental Brain Injury.

Vimala N Bharadwaj, Connor Copeland, Ethan Mathew, Jason Newbern, Trent R Anderson, Jonathan Lifshitz, Vikram D Kodibagkar, Sarah E Stabenfeldt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Sex-based differences of antioxidant enzyme nanoparticle effects following traumatic brain injury.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vimala N BharadwajSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Connor CopelandSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Ethan MathewSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Jason NewbernSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Trent R AndersonBasic Medical Sciences, University of Arizona, College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Jonathan LifshitzDepartment of Child Health, University of Arizona, College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Vikram D KodibagkarSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Sarah E StabenfeldtSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.

Funding

Detecting and Treating Traumatic Brain Injury Pathology Progression from the Inside-OutDP2HD084067 · NICHD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI STABENFELDT, SARAH E · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD084067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of effective therapeutics for brain disorders is challenging, in particular, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) severely limits access of the therapeutics into the brain parenchyma. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) may lead to transient BBB permeability that affords a unique opportunity for therapeutic delivery via intravenous administration ranging from macromolecules to nanoparticles (NPs) for developing precision therapeutics. In this regard, we address critical gaps in understanding the range/size of therapeutics, delivery window(s), and moreover, the potential impact of biological factors for optimal delivery parameters. Here we show, for the first time, to the best of our knowledge, that 24-h postfocal TBI female mice exhibit a heightened macromolecular tracer and NP accumulation compared with male mice, indicating sex-dependent differences in BBB permeability. Furthermore, we report for the first time the potential to deliver NP-based therapeutics within 3 days after focal injury in both female and male mice. The delineation of injury-induced BBB permeability with respect to sex and temporal profile is essential to more accurately tailor time-dependent precision and personalized nanotherapeutics. Impact statement In this study, we identified a sex-dependent temporal profile of blood/brain barrier disruption in a preclinical mouse model of traumatic brain injury (TBI) that contributes to starkly different macromolecule and nanoparticle delivery profiles post-TBI. The implications and potential impact of this work are profound and far reaching as it indicates that a demand of true personalized medicine for TBI is necessary to deliver the right therapeutic at the right time for the right patient.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierBrainBrain InjuriesBrain Injuries, TraumaticImmunohistochemistryMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNanoparticlesNeurogliablood-brain barrierdrug deliveryintravital microscopynanoparticlesex-dependencetraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID32697674
PMCPMC7398445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.