Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32697619›Full record

ArticleThe journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society2020

Why Formalin-fixed, Paraffin-embedded Biospecimens Must Be Used in Genomic Medicine: An Evidence-based Review and Conclusion.

William Mathieson, Geraldine A Thomas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Cancers · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

William MathiesonIntegrated Biobank of Luxembourg, Dudelange, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-1328-5629
Geraldine A ThomasDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Central Bank of Luxembourg · LUImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fresh-frozen tissue is the "gold standard" biospecimen type for next-generation sequencing (NGS). However, collecting frozen tissue is usually not feasible because clinical workflows deliver formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks. Some clinicians and researchers are reticent to embrace the use of FFPE tissue for NGS because FFPE tissue can yield low quantities of degraded DNA, containing formalin-induced mutations. We describe the process by which formalin-induced deamination can lead to artifactual cytosine (C) to thymine (T) and guanine (G) to adenine (A) (C:G > T:A) mutation calls and perform a literature review of 17 publications that compare NGS data from patient-matched fresh-frozen and FFPE tissue blocks. We conclude that although it is indeed true that sequencing data from FFPE tissue can be poorer than those from frozen tissue, any differences occur at an inconsequential magnitude, and FFPE biospecimens can be used in genomic medicine with confidence.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineFormaldehydeGenomicsParaffin EmbeddingTissue FixationArtifactsDNA GlycosylasesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationDNA GlycosylasesFormaldehydecytosinedeaminationformaldehydeUDGuracil-DNA glycosylase

Identifiers

PMID32697619
PMCPMC7400666
OpenAlexW3045031425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.