Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32697560›Full record

Trial reportOptometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry2020

The Effect of a Photochromic Contact Lens on Visual Function Indoors: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Lisa M Renzi-Hammond, John R Buch, Lauren Hacker, Jessica Cannon, Billy R Hammond

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Blue-Light Filters in Eye Care: A State-of-the-Art Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Contemporary Research Questions in the Field of Contact Lenses and Where to Next?Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Lisa M Renzi-HammondHuman Biofactors Laboratory, Institute of Gerontology, Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
John R BuchJohnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., Jacksonville, Florida.
Lauren HackerGeorgia Center for Sight, Athens, Georgia.
Jessica CannonJohnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., Jacksonville, Florida.
Billy R Hammond
University of Georgia · USJohnson & Johnson (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significancePhotochromic soft contact lenses contain light-sensitive additives that allow them to darken when exposed to ultraviolet or violet light. One question, however, is whether the lenses influence vision indoors (minimally activated). In this study, we found that the minimally activated lenses improved many aspects of visual function under bright light. PURPOSE: Photochromic contact lenses were designed to darken when exposed to outdoor sunlight. The filtering that results improves visual function under bright light conditions. Not all bright light exposures occur outdoors. In this study, we tested whether a photochromic contact lens improved visual function under conditions where the lens was minimally activated (i.e., no more than it normally would be in an indoor environment).

methodsA subject-masked contralateral design was used comparing a photochromic contact lens randomized to one eye against a nonphotochromic contact in the other eye of the same subject. Sixty subjects (mean = 34.90 ± 11.24 years) were tested. The primary endpoints consisted of four visual function outcomes: photostress recovery, glare disability, glare discomfort, and chromatic contrast. Photostress recovery was quantified by measuring the time needed to recover visual acquisition of a grating target after 5 seconds of an intense xenon white flash exposure; glare disability was evaluated as the energy in a surrounding xenon white annulus necessary to veil a central grating target; and glare discomfort was assessed using bioimaging of the squint response. Chromatic contrast was measured as thresholds for a green-yellow (580 nm) grating target superposed on a blue (460 nm) background.

resultsThe minimally activated photochromic contact demonstrated improved visual performance compared with the nonphotochromic control across all visual functions tested (P < .01).

conclusionsEven under conditions of exiguous activation (e.g., as would be expected indoors or while driving at night), a photochromic contact will improve many of the more deleterious aspects of bright light.

Indexed as

Contact Lenses, HydrophilicAdolescentAdultContrast SensitivityDouble-Blind MethodEnvironment, ControlledEquipment DesignFemaleFixation, OcularGlareHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesVision DisordersVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID32697560
PMCPMC7373450
OpenAlexW3042738011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.