Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32697521›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer assisted tomography

Differentiation of Focal-Type Autoimmune Pancreatitis From Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Using Radiomics Based on Multiphasic Computed Tomography.

Linning E, Yan Xu, Zhifeng Wu, Li Li, Na Zhang, Hao Yang, Lawrence H Schwartz, Lin Lu, Binsheng Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer assisted tomography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Understanding the Conundrum of Pancreatic Cancer in the Omics Sciences Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The impact of radiomics in diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Linning EFrom the Department of Radiology, Shanxi DAYI Hospital, Taiyuan.
Yan XuDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing.
Zhifeng WuFrom the Department of Radiology, Shanxi DAYI Hospital, Taiyuan.
Li LiDepartment of Pathology, Shanxi DAYI Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Na ZhangFrom the Department of Radiology, Shanxi DAYI Hospital, Taiyuan.
Hao YangDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Lawrence H SchwartzDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Lin LuDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Binsheng ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.

Funding

Integrating Radiomics into S0819 and Lung-MAP, Biomarker Driven Clinical Trials for Lung CancerU01CA225431 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SCHWARTZ, LAWRENCE H, ZHAO, BINSHENG · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA225431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to develop a radiomics model for a differential diagnosis of focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

methodsA total of 96 patients, 45 with AIP and 51 with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent pretreatment abdominal computed tomography imaging acquired at noncontrast, arterial, and venous phases. Furthermore, 1160 radiomics features were extracted from each phasic image to build radiomics models. The performance of radiomics model was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The results of radiomics model were also compared with those of radiologists' visual assessments.

resultsThe sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the optimal radiomics model were 93.3%, 96.1%, and 94.8%, respectively. They were higher than those of the radiologists' assessments with sensitivity of 57.78% and 73.33%, specificity of 88.24% and 90.20%, and accuracy of 75.00% and 81.25%, respectively.

conclusionRadiomics is helpful for a differential diagnosis of AIP in clinical practice as a noninvasive and quantitative method.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutoimmune PancreatitisCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalMultidetector Computed TomographyPancreatic NeoplasmsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32697521
PMCPMC9165686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.