Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32697492›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2020

Time Course of Evolving Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury: The "Shrinking Baby Lung".

John J Marini, Luciano Gattinoni

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04174313 (Ventilator-induced Lung Injury Vortex in Patients With SARS-CoV-2), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04174313 completednot on this map

Ventilator-induced Lung Injury Vortex in Patients With SARS-CoV-2

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital El CruceRan2020 to 2021Enrolled65ConditionsARDS, Mechanical Ventilation Complication, Ventilator-Induced Lung InjuryArmsCT scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Ventilator-Induced Lung Liquid and Alveolar Rupture.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Optimized ventilation power to avoid VILI.Journal of intensive care · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John J MariniUniversity of Minnesota and Regions Hospital, Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN.
Luciano GattinoniDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the potentially modifiable drivers that injure and heal the "baby lung" of acute respiratory distress syndrome and describe a rational clinical approach to favor benefit. DATA SOURCES: Published experimental studies and clinical papers that address varied aspects of ventilator-induced lung injury pathogenesis and its consequences. STUDY SELECTION: Published information relevant to the novel hypothesis of progressive lung vulnerability and to the biophysical responses of lung injury and repair. DATA EXTRACTION: None. DATA SYNTHESIS: In acute respiratory distress syndrome, the reduced size and capacity for gas exchange of the functioning "baby lung" imply loss of ventilatory capability that dwindles in proportion to severity of lung injury. Concentrating the entire ventilation workload and increasing perfusion to these already overtaxed units accentuates their potential for progressive injury. Unlike static airspace pressures, which, in theory, apply universally to aerated structures of all dimensions, the components of tidal inflation that relate to power (which include frequency and flow) progressively intensify their tissue-stressing effects on parenchyma and microvasculature as the ventilated compartment shrinks further, especially during the first phase of the evolving injury. This "ventilator-induced lung injury vortex" of the shrinking baby lung is opposed by reactive, adaptive, and reparative processes. In this context, relatively little attention has been paid to the evolving interactions between lung injury and response and to the timing of interventions that worsen, limit or reverse a potentially accelerating ventilator-induced lung injury process. Although universal and modifiable drivers hold the potential to progressively injure the functional lung units of acute respiratory distress syndrome in a positive feedback cycle, measures can be taken to interrupt that process and encourage growth and healing of the "baby lung" of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionHumansLungRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeRisk FactorsTime FactorsVentilator-Induced Lung Injury

Identifiers

PMID32697492
PMCPMC7217130
OpenAlexW3022194827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.