ArticleCancer2020
Prognostic value of blasts in peripheral blood in myelofibrosis in the ruxolitinib era.
Article in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phase 2 study of ruxolitinib and decitabine in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm in accelerated and blast phase.Blood advances · 2020Trial
- Integrating novel therapeutic strategies in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Driving disease-directed progress.British journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Article
- JAK inhibitor selection in challenging scenarios of myelofibrosis: a review.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Prevention and treatment of transformation of myeloproliferative neoplasms to acute myeloid leukemia.Haematologica · 2025Review
- HMGA2 overexpression with specific chromosomal abnormalities predominate in CALR and ASXL1 mutated myelofibrosis.Leukemia · 2025Article
- Myelofibrosis and allogeneic transplantation: critical points and challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- High molecular risk variants, severe thrombocytopenia and large unstained cells count affect the outcome in primary myelofibrosis.Journal of applied genetics · 2023Article
- Association of Myelofibrosis Phenotypes with Clinical Manifestations, Molecular Profiles, and Treatments.Cancers · 2023Review
- Myelofibrosis.Blood · 2023Review
- Trend of circulating CD34British journal of haematology · 2023Article
- Combination of ruxolitinib with ABT-737 exhibits synergistic effects in cells carrying concurrent JAK2Investigational new drugs · 2022Article
- Article
- Reduced intensity hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for accelerated-phase myelofibrosis.Blood advances · 2022Article
- Review
- Accelerated Phase of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.Acta haematologicaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCirculating blasts (peripheral blood [PB] blasts) ≥1% have long been considered an unfavorable feature for patients with primary myelofibrosis. Whether further quantification of PB blasts and their correlation with bone marrow (BM) blasts have incremental value with regard to patient prognostication is unclear. Similarly, the role of the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib (RUX) is not well defined in patients who have increased blasts.
methodsThe authors retrospectively studied 1316 patients with myelofibrosis who presented at their institution between 1984 and 2018 and had available PB and BM blasts.
resultsThe PB blast percentage influenced overall survival (OS) only among patients who had BM blasts <5%, with a median OS of 64 months for patients with 0% PB blasts, 48 months for those with 1% to 3% PB blasts, and 22 months for those with 4% PB blasts (P < .01). Patients who had 4% PB blasts and 5% to 9% BM/PB blasts had clinical features similar to those of patients who had 10% to 19% blasts. Although the OS of the former patients was longer than in patients who had 10% to 19% blasts, it was not statistically different (median OS: 22, 26, and 13 months, respectively; P > .05). Forty-four percent of patients received RUX throughout their disease course. All patients who had <10% blasts (PB or BM) and received treatment with RUX had superior OS compared with those who did not receive RUX within the same group. PB blasts ≥4% and BM blasts ≥5% were significant for predicting inferior survival in multivariate analysis.
conclusionsThe current results provide comprehensive insight into the role of peripheral blasts in patients with myelofibrosis and indicates that patients who have PB blasts ≥4% have an unfavorable prognosis. RUX provides a survival benefit to patients who have PB blasts <10%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.